Electron Survival Theory at 0K: Explained

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Denton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of electron survival at absolute zero (0K), exploring the implications of quantum mechanics, zero-point energy, and the conditions under which electrons can cease to exist. Participants examine theoretical aspects, definitions, and the behavior of particles at low temperatures.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the definition of "survival" in the context of electrons at 0K, suggesting it may refer to not turning into nothing.
  • Others mention that due to zero-point energy, particles cannot reach absolute zero, implying that electrons will always have some minimal energy and thus survive.
  • It is noted that even at 0K, particles still exhibit motion, albeit very small, due to zero-point energy, and that there is no fundamental equivalence between motion and thermodynamic temperature.
  • Some participants argue that if an electron's momentum were exactly zero, its position would be infinitely uncertain, leading to a discussion about the implications of quantum mechanics on particle behavior.
  • One participant posits that a single electron in isolation would not have a defined temperature and could theoretically move indefinitely without acceleration.
  • Another perspective is presented regarding the conditions under which electrons can disappear, emphasizing conservation laws and the rarity of such events, like meeting a positron or transforming into a muon.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of zero-point energy, the nature of motion at 0K, and the conditions for electron disappearance. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views present.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about definitions of survival, the implications of zero-point energy, and the conditions under which electrons can cease to exist. These aspects are not fully explored or agreed upon.

Denton
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
What is the theory to explain how it still manages to survive.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
May I ask what is your definition of survival? Not turning into nothing?
 
I know almost nothing about quantum physics but as far as I heard, there is always certian amount of minimum energy in system also called zero-point energy. You cannot have less than that amount of energy (Something to do with Planck scale). So Electron, nor any other particle can ever reach absolute 0k and therefore there is no problem with the electron survival.

Tachyon.
 
Last edited:
Denton said:
What is the theory to explain how it still manages to survive.
Do you perhaps mean that at 0K the atom's electrons should stop moving?
 
Tachyonie said:
I know almost nothing about quantum physics but as far as I heard, there is always certian amount of minimum energy in system also called zero-point energy. You cannot have less than that amount of energy (Something to do with Planck scale). So Electron, nor any other particle can ever reach absolute 0k and therefore there is no problem with the electron survival.

Tachyon.

Not quite, due to the zero-point energy particles will move even at 0K.
(Although this motion will be very small).
Remember that there is no fundamental "equivalence" between motion and thermodynamic temperature, it is just that they happen to be related for e.g. a classical gas.
 
f95toli said:
Not quite, due to the zero-point energy particles will move even at 0K.
(Although this motion will be very small).
Remember that there is no fundamental "equivalence" between motion and thermodynamic temperature, it is just that they happen to be related for e.g. a classical gas.

Thanks for that correction.

Tachyon.
 
Even at 0k everything still moves.

Why?

Because if it didn't we'd know it's position and momentum, which is a no-no.
 
Riogho said:
Even at 0k everything still moves.

Why?

Because if it didn't we'd know it's position and momentum, which is a no-no.

It's not really a no-no, I thought that would come as a result of any attempted measurement on the particle, not simply knowing for sure that a particle is destined to be at place X with momentum = 0.
 
If momentum were exactly zero, position would be infinitely wide. It literally could be found anywhere in the universe, and it woule be indistinguishable from any other electron, so you'd have no idea if that was "the one" you saw.
 
  • #10
A single electron in the middle of nowhere will just move in one direction forever. No reason to accelerate, ie no reason to vibrate. So it seems that temperature is undefined for a single electron with nothing nearby, or it's always 0K. Do the experts confirm?
 
  • #11
Electron survival

As I recall, particles like electrons always survive unless there is a suitable reaction
they can undergo that allows them to disappear. This limits their options. Getting rid of their energy is just one problem they have.

Energy and momentum have to be conserved. Electrons have a rest mass, so even if they could stop moving they would have to get rid of the energy tied up in their rest mass before they could be allowed to leave. Momentum conservation normally means they have to hand over their momentum to another particle before they are allowed to go on holiday. There is also this thing called CPT symmetry, which lays down some rules about when they are allowed disappear.

My understanding is that electrons tend to survive pretty well. They only seem to be allowed to get out of their responsibilities by meeting up with positrons or getting promoted to being a muon or something like that. This is very rare, they can't just pop out of existence when they are running low on energy.
 
  • #12
jackle said:
As I recall, particles like electrons always survive unless there is a suitable reaction
they can undergo that allows them to disappear. This limits their options. Getting rid of their energy is just one problem they have.

Energy and momentum have to be conserved. Electrons have a rest mass, so even if they could stop moving they would have to get rid of the energy tied up in their rest mass before they could be allowed to leave. Momentum conservation normally means they have to hand over their momentum to another particle before they are allowed to go on holiday. There is also this thing called CPT symmetry, which lays down some rules about when they are allowed disappear.

My understanding is that electrons tend to survive pretty well. They only seem to be allowed to get out of their responsibilities by meeting up with positrons or getting promoted to being a muon or something like that. This is very rare, they can't just pop out of existence when they are running low on energy.

Does it depend on a genetic disposition? :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K