Electron Transition: Why Doesn't Excited Electron Absorb Extra Photon?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter alamdar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Transition
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of excited electrons in relation to photon absorption, specifically why an excited electron does not absorb an additional photon before returning to the ground state. The scope includes conceptual understanding and experimental evidence regarding multiphoton absorption.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested, Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why an excited electron does not absorb an extra photon before transitioning to the ground state.
  • Another participant challenges this assumption, suggesting that it is possible for excited electrons to absorb more energy.
  • A later reply confirms that multiphoton absorption is indeed possible and has been demonstrated experimentally.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There appears to be disagreement regarding the initial assumption that excited electrons cannot absorb additional photons, with some participants asserting that multiphoton absorption is a valid phenomenon.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the underlying assumptions about photon absorption and the conditions under which multiphoton absorption occurs.

alamdar
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
please tell me that why is it that an excited electron don't absorbs an extra photon before coming to ground state.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
alamdar said:
please tell me that why is it that an excited electron don't absorbs an extra photon before coming to ground state.

What makes you think that it doesn't?

Zz.
 
okkkkkkkay i got the idea so excited electron can absorb more energy.
 
alamdar said:
okkkkkkkay i got the idea so excited electron can absorb more energy.

You are making very little sense here.

Multiphoton absorption is certainly possible and has been shown experimentally[1]. This is not new.

Zz.

[1] G. Mainfray and G. Manus et al 1991 Rep. Prog. Phys. v.54, p.1333 (1991).
 
okay thanx:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K