Electron traveling between charged plates

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the minimum horizontal velocity required for an electron to pass through two charged plates with a length of 50 cm, spacing of 1 cm, and a potential difference of 20V. Participants emphasize the need to account for both vertical and horizontal components of velocity, with the vertical acceleration derived from the electric field, given by the equation \( a_y = \frac{Eq}{m} \). The final horizontal velocity is determined using the time taken to traverse the plates, leading to a calculated minimum velocity of approximately \( 9.38 \times 10^7 \, \text{m/s} \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts such as electric fields and forces.
  • Familiarity with kinematic equations, specifically \( S = ut + \frac{1}{2}at^2 \).
  • Knowledge of the properties of electrons, including charge and mass.
  • Ability to perform algebraic manipulations and solve equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric field strength using \( E = \frac{\Delta V}{\Delta d} \).
  • Learn about projectile motion in electric fields and how it differs from gravitational fields.
  • Explore the implications of varying initial velocities on the trajectory of charged particles.
  • Investigate the effects of different potential differences on the motion of electrons in similar setups.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of charged particles in electric fields, particularly in the context of particle accelerators or similar experiments.

jisbon
Messages
475
Reaction score
30
Homework Statement
Plates have length 50cm, spacing 1cm, and P.D of 20V. Find minimum velocity of electron such that it just emerge from plates.
Relevant Equations
##F_{e}=qe##
##E=\frac{\triangle V}{\triangle d}##
F=ma
1567740716335.png

So I can understand how to find out velocity of electron moving between these 2 plates, by using:
##F=ma##
##a=\frac{F}{m} =\frac{qE}{m}##
##v^2=2as = \frac{2q}{m}Ex##
##v = \sqrt{\frac{2q}{m}Ex}##
where x = 0.01 , E =20 etc. Answer seems to be way too off, which is expected.
How am I supposed to find the 'minimum' velocity though?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jisbon said:
Homework Statement: Plates have length 50cm, spacing 1cm, and P.D of 20V. Find minimum velocity of electron such that it just emerge from plates.
Homework Equations: ##F_{e}=qe##
##E=\frac{\triangle V}{\triangle d}##
F=ma

View attachment 249240
So I can understand how to find out velocity of electron moving between these 2 plates, by using:
##F=ma##
##a=\frac{F}{m} =\frac{qE}{m}##
##v^2=2as = \frac{2q}{m}Ex##
##v = \sqrt{\frac{2q}{m}Ex}##
where x = 0.01 , E =20 etc. Answer seems to be way too off, which is expected.
How am I supposed to find the 'minimum' velocity though?
You seem to have solved for the vertical component of the final velocity.

How long does it take (i.e., how much time does it take) for the electron to travel from one plate to the other if the initial, vertical component of the velocity is 0?
 
collinsmark said:
You seem to have solved for the vertical component of the final velocity.

How long does it take (i.e., how much time does it take) for the electron to travel from one plate to the other if the initial, vertical component of the velocity is 0?
##S_{x}=u_{x}t+1/2a_{x}t^2 =0 +1/2at^2##
May I ask why is that the vertical component that I found? Isn't it supposed to be the 'overall' final velocity?

And if I only have final vertical velocity, can I consult if I am still able to use ##S_{y}=u_{y}t+1/2a_{y}t^2## where a= 9.8?
 
jisbon said:
##S_{x}=u_{x}t+1/2a_{x}t^2 =0 +1/2at^2##
May I ask why is that the vertical component that I found? Isn't it supposed to be the 'overall' final velocity?
For the problem to be solved, you need to solve for both the vertical component and the horizontal component of the final velocity.

In the work you showed in the original post, you have solved for the component in the direction that involves acceleration. So now what about the direction which does not involve acceleration?

What's the maximum amount of time it will take an electron to get from the left side to the right side without touching either plate?
And if I only have final vertical velocity, can I consult if I am still able to use ##S_{y}=u_{y}t+1/2a_{y}t^2## where a= 9.8?

The equation is valid, but you'll likely find that the gravitational force is completely negligible compared to the electric force. So although the equation is fine, no, you wouldn't use a=9.8.

----

By the way, just for clarity, is there anything left out of the problem statement such as the initial direction of the electron? Does it specify that the electron is initially traveling in the horizontal direction or can it be shot in at a slight angle?
 
you can study the problem exactly like that of a projectile with initial velocity v (which seems to be only horizontal in our case) inside a gravitational field but instead of ##a_y=g## you take ##a_y=\frac{Eq}{m}##.
 
jisbon said:
Homework Statement: Plates have length 50cm, spacing 1cm, and P.D of 20V. Find minimum velocity of electron such that it just emerge from plates.
Homework Equations: ##F_{e}=qe##
##E=\frac{\triangle V}{\triangle d}##
F=ma

View attachment 249240
So I can understand how to find out velocity of electron moving between these 2 plates, by using:
##F=ma##
##a=\frac{F}{m} =\frac{qE}{m}##
##v^2=2as = \frac{2q}{m}Ex##
##v = \sqrt{\frac{2q}{m}Ex}##
where x = 0.01 , E =20 etc. Answer seems to be way too off, which is expected.
How am I supposed to find the 'minimum' velocity though?
1) if the electron has very small initial horizontal velocity, it will be deflected into one of the plates.

2) if the electron has a very high initial horizontal velocity, it will shoot between the plates with mininal deflection.

Your task is to find the horizontal velocity at the transition between being too slow and fast enough to escape.

Why do you use spoilers on your homework posts?
 
PeroK said:
1) if the electron has very small initial horizontal velocity, it will be deflected into one of the plates.

2) if the electron has a very high initial horizontal velocity, it will shoot between the plates with mininal deflection.

Your task is to find the horizontal velocity at the transition between being too slow and fast enough to escape.

Why do you use spoilers on your homework posts?
Delta2 said:
you can study the problem exactly like that of a projectile with initial velocity v (which seems to be only horizontal in our case) inside a gravitational field but instead of ##a_y=g## you take ##a_y=\frac{Eq}{m}##.
collinsmark said:
For the problem to be solved, you need to solve for both the vertical component and the horizontal component of the final velocity.

In the work you showed in the original post, you have solved for the component in the direction that involves acceleration. So now what about the direction which does not involve acceleration?

What's the maximum amount of time it will take an electron to get from the left side to the right side without touching either plate?The equation is valid, but you'll likely find that the gravitational force is completely negligible compared to the electric force. So although the equation is fine, no, you wouldn't use a=9.8.

----

By the way, just for clarity, is there anything left out of the problem statement such as the initial direction of the electron? Does it specify that the electron is initially traveling in the horizontal direction or can it be shot in at a slight angle?

To all:
Electron is assumed as initially traveling in the horizontal direction.
I used spoilers because I thought my attempt is not related to the solution.
So as far as I'm concerned, there is only acceleration due to the electric field in the vertical direction and no acceleration in the horizontal direction.
So my job is to find out the velocity for just the electron to squeeze out from the plates, so something like this? (Pardon my drawing)
1567767363255.png

Alright so to find the time taken, since initial velocity of the vertical component is 0 (since it is initially traveling in the horizontal direction),
##S_{y}=u_{y}t+1/2a_{y}t^2 ##
where ##u=0##, so,
##S_{y}=1/2a_{y}t^2 ##
where ##a_y=\frac{Eq}{m} ##
So can I assume:
##0.05=\frac{1}{2}\frac{Eq}{m}t^2=\frac{1}{2}\frac{(20)(1.6*10^{-19})}{9.11*10^{-31}}t^2##
So ##t=1.69*10^{-7}s##?
Am I on the right track here?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
yes you are definitely on the right track. Now all you need to do is to find the horizontal velocity, such that in the same time t, it travels horizontal distance d=length of plate.
 
jisbon said:
To all:
Electron is assumed as initially traveling in the horizontal direction.
I used spoilers because I thought my attempt is not related to the solution.
So as far as I'm concerned, there is only acceleration due to the electric field in the vertical direction and no acceleration in the horizontal direction.
So my job is to find out the velocity for just the electron to squeeze out from the plates, so something like this? (Pardon my drawing)
View attachment 249252
Alright so to find the time taken, since initial velocity of the vertical component is 0 (since it is initially traveling in the horizontal direction),
##S_{y}=u_{y}t+1/2a_{y}t^2 ##
where ##u=0##, so,
##S_{y}=1/2a_{y}t^2 ##
where ##a_y=\frac{Eq}{m} ##
So can I assume:
##0.05=\frac{1}{2}\frac{Eq}{m}t^2=\frac{1}{2}\frac{(20)(1.6*10^{-19})}{9.11*10^{-31}}t^2##
So ##t=1.69*10^{-7}s##?
Am I on the right track here?
Yes, although why calculate ##t##?

There are only three variables: acceleration, length and width. Time is bound to cancel out if you stick with the algebra.
 
  • #10
PeroK said:
Yes, although why calculate ##t##?

There are only three variables: acceleration, length and width. Time is bound to cancel out if you stick with the algebra.
Won't I need to find t to find out the horizontal velocity? Since I'm determining the velocity needed.

Delta2 said:
yes you are definitely on the right track. Now all you need to do is to find the horizontal velocity, such that in the same time t, it travels horizontal distance d=length of plate.
Hmm okay :)
So since ##t=1.69*10^{-7}s ##, and horziontal distance traveled is 0.1m,
##S_{x}=u_{x}t+1/2a_{x}t^2## where ##a_{x}##=0,
##0.1=u_{x} (1.69*10^{-7}s)##,
##u_{x} = 591715.9763m/s##
Since I have ##u_{x}## and ##v_{y}## (##v_{y}=u_{y}t+at= 0 + \frac{Eq}{m} (1.69*10^{-7}s) =594375.4116m/s##
So technically, shouldn't the velocity be ##\sqrt{u_{x}^2+v_{y}^2}## = 838695.3717m/s?
Answer seems to be ##9.38*10^7## instead :/
 
  • #11
jisbon said:
Won't I need to find t to find out the horizontal velocity? Since I'm determining the velocity needed.Hmm okay :)
So since ##t=1.69*10^{-7}s ##, and horziontal distance traveled is 0.1m,
##S_{x}=u_{x}t+1/2a_{x}t^2## where ##a_{x}##=0,
##0.1=u_{x} (1.69*10^{-7}s)##,
##u_{x} = 591715.9763m/s##
Since I have ##u_{x}## and ##v_{y}## (##v_{y}=u_{y}t+at= 0 + \frac{Eq}{m} (1.69*10^{-7}s) =594375.4116m/s##
So technically, shouldn't the velocity be ##\sqrt{u_{x}^2+v_{y}^2}## = 838695.3717m/s?
Answer seems to be ##9.38*10^7## instead :/
It's the initial horizontal velocity you are looking for.

You do like your numbers!

At this level of physics, a fear of algebra is a serious if not fatal handicap.
 
  • #12
jisbon said:
Won't I need to find t to find out the horizontal velocity? Since I'm determining the velocity needed.Hmm okay :)
So since ##t=1.69*10^{-7}s ##, and horziontal distance traveled is 0.1m,
##S_{x}=u_{x}t+1/2a_{x}t^2## where ##a_{x}##=0,
##0.1=u_{x} (1.69*10^{-7}s)##,
##u_{x} = 591715.9763m/s##
Since I have ##u_{x}## and ##v_{y}## (##v_{y}=u_{y}t+at= 0 + \frac{Eq}{m} (1.69*10^{-7}s) =594375.4116m/s##
So technically, shouldn't the velocity be ##\sqrt{u_{x}^2+v_{y}^2}## = 838695.3717m/s?
Answer seems to be ##9.38*10^7## instead :/
Also, you need to decide what the horizontal distance actually is. You have it as variously 10, 20 and 50cm in your posts.
 
  • #13
PeroK said:
It's the initial horizontal velocity you are looking for.

You do like your numbers!

At this level of physics, a fear of algebra is a serious if not fatal handicap.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but won't the initial and final horizontal velocity be the same?
 
  • #14
PeroK said:
Also, you need to decide what the horizontal distance actually is. You have it as variously 10, 20 and 50cm in your posts.
My bad,

##S_{x}=u_{x}t+1/2a_{x}t^2##
Where ##S_{x}= 0.5 ,a_{x}=0##
After doing the same steps as above, I will still get resultant velocity as ##3.02*10^7 m/s##
 
  • #15
jisbon said:
My bad,

##S_{x}=u_{x}t+1/2a_{x}t^2##
Where ##S_{x}= 0.5 ,a_{x}=0##
After doing the same steps as above, I will still get resultant velocity as ##3.02*10^7 m/s##
There is always lots of room for error when you work with complicated numbers with lots and lots of significant digits.

Why not try an an algebraic approach?

The irony is that I've done it algebraically and can see that the length must be ##50cm##. If I'd used your approach maybe I would have got something wrong as well.
 
  • #16
jisbon said:
To all:
Electron is assumed as initially traveling in the horizontal direction.
I used spoilers because I thought my attempt is not related to the solution.
So as far as I'm concerned, there is only acceleration due to the electric field in the vertical direction and no acceleration in the horizontal direction.
So my job is to find out the velocity for just the electron to squeeze out from the plates, so something like this? (Pardon my drawing)
View attachment 249252
Alright so to find the time taken, since initial velocity of the vertical component is 0 (since it is initially traveling in the horizontal direction),
##S_{y}=u_{y}t+1/2a_{y}t^2 ##
where ##u=0##, so,
##S_{y}=1/2a_{y}t^2 ##
where ##a_y=\frac{Eq}{m} ##
So can I assume:
##0.05=\frac{1}{2}\frac{Eq}{m}t^2=\frac{1}{2}\frac{(20)(1.6*10^{-19})}{9.11*10^{-31}}t^2##
So ##t=1.69*10^{-7}s##?
Am I on the right track here?
This value of ##t## is wrong.
 
  • #17
PeroK said:
This value of ##t## is wrong.
Oh... Let me check and get back :)

Hmm, so assuming this is correct:
##0.05=\frac{1}{2}\frac{Eq}{m}t^2##

##t^2 = 0.05/0.5/ \frac {(20)(1.6*10^{-19})}{9.11*10^{-31}}##
##t^2 = 2.84*10^{-14}##
##t = 1.69 *10^{-7}## ?
Not sure which part I messed up
 
  • #18
jisbon said:
Oh... Let me check and get back :)
I never calculated ##t## in the first place. All I did was divide the length by the answer for velocity you gave and it was different from the ##t## you got. You could have done that yourself.
 
  • #19
PeroK said:
I never calculated ##t## in the first place. All I did was divide the length by the answer for velocity you gave and it was different from the ##t## you got. You could have done that yourself.
But this equation is correct, right? ##0.05=\frac{1}{2}\frac{Eq}{m}t^2##
 
  • #20
jisbon said:
But this equation is correct, right? ##0.05=\frac{1}{2}\frac{Eq}{m}t^2##
Leaving aside the issue of units, yes.
 
  • #21
PeroK said:
Leaving aside the issue of units, yes.
And :
##E= 20V##
##q = 1.6*10^{-19}##
##m = 9.11*10^{-31}##?
 
  • #22
jisbon said:
And :
##E= 20V##

For a capacitor:

##E = V/d##

An Electric field is dimensionally different from a voltage.
 
  • #23
jisbon said:
But this equation is correct, right? ##0.05=\frac{1}{2}\frac{Eq}{m}t^2##
0.5 cm ≠ .05 m. This might be the "issue of units" that @PeroK referred to.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #24
PeroK said:
Leaving aside the issue of units, yes.
TSny said:
0.5 cm ≠ .05 m. This might be the "issue of units" that @PeroK referred to.
Hi all, thanks for your help :) The value seems to be alright, but the power is off by ##10^1##, was wondering if anyone of y'all could help figure it out :)

##0.5=\frac{1}{2}\frac{Eq}{m}t^2 = \frac{1}{2}\frac{\frac{V}{d}q}{m}t^2 = \frac{1}{2}\frac{\frac{20}{0.
01}(1.6*10^{-19})}{9.11*10^{-31}}t^2##
## t = 5.33*10^{-8}##
##u_{x}=s_{x}/t = l/t = 0.5/ (5.33*10^{-8})= 9380863.03939..##
----------------------
##v_{y}=0.5a_{y}t^2 = 0.5 (\frac{\frac{V}{d}q}{m})t^2= 0.5 (\frac{\frac{20}{0.01}1.6*10^{-19}}{9.11*10^{-31}})(5.33*10^{-8})^2 = 0.49894##

So ##v=\sqrt{u_{x}^2+v_{y}^2}=\sqrt{(9380863.03939)^2+( 0.49894)^2} =9380863.03939m/s =9.38*10^6##

Final answer's supposed to be ##9.38*10^7## :/
 
  • #25
jisbon said:
##0.5=\frac{1}{2}\frac{Eq}{m}t^2 =##….
Explain how you got the value of 0.5 on the left side. What does this number represent and what are its units?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
  • #26
First of all I don't understand why you calculate ##v_y## you are not asked for that (you are not asked for the magnitude of the vertical component at exit or the magnitude of the velocity at exit), you are asked only to calculate ##v_x##, that is the horizontal velocity with which the electron enters the electric field.

Other than that @TSny was just ahead of me in time :D.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny
  • #27
TSny said:
Explain how you got the value of 0.5 on the left side. What does this number represent and what are its units?
50cm = 0.5m
 
  • #28
jisbon said:
50cm = 0.5m
But this equation you wrote ##0.5=\frac{1}{2}a_yt^2##is for the vertical motion. 0.5m is the length of the plates not the spacing between the plates which is 1cm. Shouldn it be ##\frac{1}{2}cm=\frac{0.01}{2}m=0.005m=\frac{1}{2}a_yt^2##??
 
Last edited:
  • #29
Delta2 said:
But this equation you wrote ##0.5=\frac{1}{2}a_yt^2##is for the vertical motion. 0.5m is the length of the plates not the spacing between the plates which is 1cm. Shouldn it be ##\frac{1}{2}cm=\frac{0.01}{2}m=0.005m=\frac{1}{2}a_yt^2##??
Oh gosh. Yep I realize my mistake. Kept messing up between the length and width :H
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K