Electrostatic energy of two opposite charges in water and in a vacuum

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around comparing the electrostatic energy of two opposite charges, e and -e, positioned 7 angstroms apart in both water and a vacuum. The problem is situated within the context of electrostatics and involves concepts such as dielectric constants and Bjerrum length.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the appropriateness of the equation for electrostatic energy and the definition of Bjerrum length. There is discussion about the dielectric constant for water and vacuum, as well as the interpretation of variables in the equations presented.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided equations related to electrostatic energy and Bjerrum length, while others are clarifying the meanings of the variables involved. There appears to be a productive exchange of ideas regarding the setup and definitions, although no consensus has been reached on the correct approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating potential misunderstandings about the variables in the equations, particularly the distinction between dielectric constant and distance. The specific distance between charges is noted as a missing element in the equations discussed.

JordanGo
Messages
72
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Compare the electrostatic energy of two opposite charges e and -e, a distance 7 angstroms apart in water at room temperature and that in vacuum (express the energy in terms of Bjerrum length)

Homework Equations



E = 1/(4(p[itex]\pi[/itex][itex]\epsilon[/itex]D)*(-e^2)/r^2 ?

The Attempt at a Solution



First of all is this the right equation to use? If so, is the Bjerrum length the distance between the charges? And for a vacuum is the dialectic constant (D) just 1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Electrostatic energy is:[tex]E=-\frac{e^2}{4\pi \varepsilon D}[/tex]
Bjerrum length:
[tex]\lambda_B=\frac{e^2}{4\pi \varepsilon k_BT}[/tex]
 
So, for water:
E=[itex]\lambda[/itex]KT/80?

And for a vacuum:
[itex]\lambda[/itex]KT?
 
No, we have:
[tex]\lambda_B k_BT=\frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon}[/tex]
so put it into formula for energy
 
I did do that, D=80 for water and D=1 for a vacuum
 
In my formula "D" denotes distance
 
Ok that makes sense, so D is dialectric constant and let's say r now is the distance, which is missing in the equations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K