Electrostatics - Finding potential V(r,z) given hyperbolic boundry conditions.

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
Illeism
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm trying to derive Equation (1) from the paper: http://idv.sinica.edu.tw/jwang/EP101/Paul-Trap/Winter 91 ajp demo trapping dust.pdf

We are working with a cylindrically symmetric geometry along the z-axis.
[itex]r^2 = x^2 + y^2[/itex]

We have electrodes described by the hyperbolas:
[itex]z^2 = z_0^2 + r^2/2[/itex]
[itex]z^2 = r^2/2 - z_0^2[/itex]

The top and bottom electrode (described by [itex]z^2 = z_0^2 + r^2/2[/itex]) are held at a potential [itex]V_0[/itex] with respect to our ground ring (described by [itex]z^2 = r^2/2 - z_0^2[/itex]) held at potential [itex]0.[/itex]

We want to find the potential V(r,z) for the region inside the hyperbolas (the region containing the origin).

The solution is:
[itex]V(z,r) = V_0(\frac{1}{4z_0^2})(2z^2+r_0^2-r^2)[/itex]


Homework Equations



[itex]\nabla^2 V = 0[/itex]
(no charge inside volume)


The Attempt at a Solution



So, for boundary conditions we have:
[itex]V(z,r)=V_0[/itex] when [itex]z^2 = z_0^2 + r^2/2[/itex]
[itex]V(z,r)=0[/itex] when [itex]z^2 = r^2/2 - z_0^2[/itex]

I can't think of any appropriate image that would generate hyperbolic potentials, and following Jackson's section on boundary value problems (physics.bu.edu/~pankajm/LN/hankel.pdf) seems to be giving unnecessarily complex solutions, even though the final solution is quite simple.

At this point I'm at a loss. Is there a better way to approach this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I found a solution, in case anyone is curious:

The symmetry of the problem allows us to assert that we only will have even terms in our potential. So we have something of the form:

[itex]V= const + \displaystyle\sum_{\text{even }i}{a_ir^2+b_iz^2}[/itex]

Hoping that the lowest order term is dominant, we see what happens if we drop the other terms:

[itex]V=a r^2 + b z^2 = a(x^2+y^2) + b z^2 + const[/itex]

And take the laplacian:

[itex]\nabla^2 V= 0 = 2a + 2a + 2 b[/itex]
so
[itex]2a=-b[/itex]

Substituting back into our equation for V, we get:

[itex]V=a r^2 - 2a z^2 + const = a(r^2-2z^2) + const[/itex]

Now, its just a matter of relating our constants ([itex]V_0, z_0[/itex]) for a specific equipotential and we're set!


So, the actual method to generate the potential is starting from a saddle shaped potential (which allows for the trapping of particles; thus the motivation), and then figuring out what electrodes need to be to generate it... which is much easier than starting with the shape of the electrodes!