I Electroweak Feynman Rules: Confusion about the photon-W boson interaction term

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Elmo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electroweak
Elmo
Messages
37
Reaction score
6
TL;DR Summary
A confusion about the photon-W boson interaction term
This screenshot is from Quantum Field Theory by Mandl and Shaw, 2nd Edition.

I had a question about the vertex factor feynman rule (given below the daigram) of the photon and W+, W- interaction term. Its lagrangian density is given in the third and fourth line of (19.3 a)

What confuses me is the fact that this diagram shows all the momenta directed inwards. Is it the only possible way this coupling can exist or can we also show something like say, the W+ and W- boson momenta directed outwards from the vertex and photon coming inwards ? How will the vertex factor change in that case ? Is it simply a matter of flipping the signs of the momenta in the vertex factor expression ?

Also, is it possible to have a vertex where there is something like a Bremsstrahlung on a single W+ or W- line ?
Screenshot (469).png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The directions are arbitrary labels. It's like voltages or currents in electric circuits. What direction you use to define them is arbitrary, choosing the opposite direction just flips the sign of all values.

W -> W+photon is possible, sure. Here is a diagram.
 
  • Like
Likes Elmo, vanhees71 and dextercioby
Sorry for the late reply.
I just require a bit more clarification on the answer. When @mfb says to flip the signs of all values for oppositely directed momenta, does it mean to flip the signs of momenta only or also of the iota and e ?

Also how will the vertex factor get modified for W->W+photon ?
And how will it be different for W+ and W- ?
I have included a picture of what I think the vertex factors ought to look like, based upon my reference Mandl and Shaw. Do please have a look at it.
 

Attachments

  • ew.png
    ew.png
    19.1 KB · Views: 133
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
18
Views
40K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top