Photon-Massive Vector Boson Vertex Feynman Rule

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the Feynman rule for an interaction term in the Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) Lagrangian that couples the electromagnetic field to a neutral massive vector boson field. The interaction term is expressed as $$\mathcal{L}_{int} = \epsilon F_{\mu \nu}G^{\mu \nu}$$, where $$F_{\mu \nu}$$ and $$G^{\mu \nu}$$ represent the field strength tensors for the photon and the massive vector boson, respectively. The correct Feynman rule for the vertex is established as $$i\epsilon(q^{\mu}\eta^{\nu}+q^{\nu}\eta^{\mu}+k^{\mu}\epsilon^{\nu}+k^{\nu}\epsilon^{\mu})$$, which incorporates all possible scalar products without requiring index contraction at the vertex.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Electrodynamics (QED)
  • Familiarity with Feynman rules and vertex interactions
  • Knowledge of field strength tensors and their properties
  • Proficiency in manipulating four-momentum and polarization vectors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Feynman rules in QED, focusing on interaction terms
  • Learn about the properties of anti-symmetric tensors in field theory
  • Explore the implications of vertex corrections in particle interactions
  • Investigate the role of polarization vectors in scattering amplitudes
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, particle physicists, and graduate students specializing in quantum field theory, particularly those working with QED and vector boson interactions.

stack
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1. The Problem
I am trying to find the feynman rule which corresponds to the addition of an interaction term to the QED lagrangian which couples the electromagnetic field to a neutral massive vector boson field. In this problem, $$k^\mu$$ corresponds to the photon 4-momentum and $$q^\mu$$ corresponds to the massive vector boson 4-momentum.

Homework Equations


$$\mathcal{L}_{int} = \epsilon F_{\mu \nu}G^{\mu \nu}$$ where $$F_{\mu \nu} = \partial_\mu A_\nu - \partial_\nu A_\mu$$ and $$A_\mu$$ is the electromagnetic field operator. Similarly, $$G^{\mu \nu}$$ is the same as $$F$$ only now for the massive vector field $$B^\mu$$.

The Attempt at a Solution


Usually, when I find the feynman rule that corresponds to a term that has derivatives in the Lagrangian, I just bring down a momentum from the exponential in the expansion of the field in momentum space. So I thought that the following would work:
$$i\mathcal{M} = i\epsilon (k_\mu q^\mu + k_\nu q^\nu - k_\mu q^\nu - k_\nu q^\mu)$$
However, this does not make sense because two of the terms here would contract and two would not, leaving two terms with indices and two terms without. This just doesn't make sense. So on my second attempt, I figured that there should be a Kronecker delta that makes sure that $\mu$ and $\nu$ are the same:
$$i\mathcal{M} = i\epsilon (k_\mu q^\mu + k_\nu q^\nu - k_\mu q^\nu - k_\nu q^\mu)\delta_\mu^\nu$$
However, it should be easy to see that this is zero. Then I tried to use the fact that the field strength tensors are anti-symmetric to eliminate some terms, but I ran into the same problems. Any help would be greatly appreciated. I am quite lost.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, your interaction term will have terms like
<br /> \partial_{\mu}A_{\nu}\partial^{\mu}B^{\nu}<br />
and all other possibilities of interchanging \mu,\nu, which gives 4 terms.
In momentum space, you have terms coming from each one of these terms that give you
<br /> k_{\mu}\epsilon_{\nu}q^{\mu}\eta^{\nu}=(k\cdot q)(\epsilon\cdot\eta)<br />
where \epsilon,\eta are the polarisations of the photon and the massive vector boson, respectively.
Again, you have all 4 possible scalar products.
So I think the Feynman rule for a vertex will just be given by:
<br /> i\epsilon(q^{\mu}\eta^{\nu}+q^{\nu}\eta^{\mu}+k^{ \mu} \epsilon^{\nu}+k^{\nu}\epsilon^{\mu})<br />
These indices don't need be contracted here on the vertex, they will be contracted with the propagators later on.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K