MHB *elements and generators of U(14)

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Generators
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
elements and generators of U(14)

\begin{align*}\displaystyle
&\text{(a)the identity is } \color{red}{1} \\
&\text{(b) U(14) is the set } \color{red}{\{1,3,4,5,6,8,9,10,11,12,13\}}\\
&\text{(c) |1|}={\color{red}{1}} \text{ since }1.1 \equiv 12^1\\
&(d) |13|={\color{red}{2}}
\text{ since }(13)^1=13\ne 1,
(13)^2 \equiv _{14} ^{\quad(-1)^2}=1\\
&\text{(e) the inverse of 13 is } {\color{red}{13}}\\
&\quad\text{ Since} 13^2 = 1 \mod 14, 13 \text{is its own inverse.}\\
&\text{(f) the generator of this group is }\\
&\quad\text{The subgroup generated by}\\
&\quad{\color{red}{<3>}}=\{3^k| k \in \Bbb{Z}\} = \{3,9,13,11,5,1\}\\
&\quad{\color{red}{<5>}}=\{5^k| k \in \Bbb{Z}\} = \{5,11 13,9,3\}\\
&(g) Abelian/non-Abelian? \\
&\quad\text{Abelian group of order } \color{red}{6}\\
&\text{(h) U(14) has subgroups.}\\
&\quad\textit{<11>}=\{11^k|k\in \Bbb{Z}\} = \{ 11, 9, 1 \} 6 \ne U(14)
\end{align*}

hopefully

(d) (h) was guesstimates? others maybe
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi karush,

Here are a few comments on what you've written:

(b) Your set for $U(14)$ needs revision. Try examining it again and seeing what needs to be changed.

(f) The subgroup generated by 5 needs revision as well. When looking at a subgroup generated by an element, one big hint that something is not quite right is when the identity is not present in the subgroup.

(g) You're correct that $U(14)$ has order 6, which conflicts with part (b) because you have 11 elements listed.

(h) It's not quite clear what you meant when you say $U(14)$ has subgroups, because every group always has at least "two" subgroups - namely the group itself and the subgroup consisting only of the identity. Note: "two" could be one in the trivial case that the group consists only of the identity.

I hope this helps get things going in the right direction.
 
mahalo
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
819
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
754
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
712
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K