Can elevons and rudders effectively steer spacecraft in the vacuum of space?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bluej774
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Elevons and rudders on spacecraft, such as NASA's Space Shuttle, are primarily utilized during atmospheric entry to control pitch, roll, and yaw. While these aerosurfaces assist in vehicle load management during ascent, they are inactive during the on-orbit phase (OPS 2), where the Reaction Control System (RCS) jets take over for attitude adjustments. The transition from RCS to aerosurfaces occurs at specific dynamic pressure thresholds during entry, enabling precise control as the Shuttle re-enters the atmosphere. The misconception that thrusters require air to function is clarified by Newton's law of conservation of momentum, confirming their effectiveness in the vacuum of space.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of NASA Space Shuttle operations, specifically OPS 1, OPS 2, and OPS 3.
  • Familiarity with Reaction Control System (RCS) mechanics and functionality.
  • Knowledge of aerodynamic principles and their application in atmospheric versus vacuum environments.
  • Basic grasp of Newton's laws of motion, particularly the conservation of momentum.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanics of the Reaction Control System (RCS) in spacecraft.
  • Study the operational phases of the Space Shuttle, focusing on ascent and entry dynamics.
  • Explore the principles of aerodynamics in both atmospheric and vacuum conditions.
  • Learn about the design and function of spacecraft aerosurfaces during re-entry.
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, space mission planners, and students of astronautics will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in spacecraft control systems and atmospheric re-entry dynamics.

bluej774
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Why is it that elevons and rudders like those seen on NASA's various orbiters succeed in adjusting the pitch, roll, and yaw of crafts in the vacuum of space? I was under the impression that such devices relied upon the resistance of air (or water) to function. Why do they work in a vacuum?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Where did you read that they're used in orbit? Surely they're only used during re-entry and landing.
 
A brief primer on Shuttle operations: OPS 1 (Operation Sequence 1) is the ascent phase of the flight. The Shuttle switches to OPS 2 (on-orbit) after orbit insertion, and finally to OPS 3 (entry) to end the flight.

The Shuttle's aerosurfaces primary use is during entry. The elevons are used during ascent, but only to control vehicle loads. While on-orbit, the aerosurfaces are not used at all. The aerosurfaces aren't even powered during OPS 2. The Shuttle instead uses its Reaction Control System jets while on-orbit to change the vehicle's attitude.

During entry, the vehicle transitions from RCS to aerosurfaces to control vehicle attitude in a staged manner. The APUs that power the aerosurfaces are powered up about an hour before entry. The aerosurfaces themselves remain disabled for a while. The deorbit burn places the Shuttle in an orbit that intersects the atmosphere.

The forward RCS thrusters are disabled at entry interface (essentially the point at which the atmosphere starts to be noticeable). Attitude control during the early phases of entry comes from the rear RCS thrusters only. The ailerons are enabled and the roll jets are disabled at 10 pounds per square foot dynamic pressure. The elevators are enabled and the pitch jets are disabled at 20 pounds per square foot dynamic pressure. Finally, the rudder is activated and the yaw jets are disabled when the vehicle's speed drops below Mach 3.5.
 
I was afraid of that. But, thank you, that was exactly the information I was looking for.

Here's a follow-up question. So for everything besides forward thrust which is provided by the main engines and the maneuvering engines they use the forward control thrusters and aft control thrusters in order to control pitch, roll, and yaw while in space?
 
The wikipedia page has a pretty good basic description of steering the shuttle in space.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_orbiter

The aerodynamic look of the shuttle is basically only to help it through the Earth's atmosphere; up in space it could be shaped like the statue of liberty and it wouldn't make any difference.

Another common fallacy is the idea that a thruster needs air to "push" against in order to be effective; Newton's law of conservation of momentum means that they work perfectly well in space.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K