Eliminating the xy-Term: Solving Rotating Axes Problem with θ = 30 degrees

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter orcbum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axes Rotating
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the process of eliminating the xy-term from a conic section equation through rotation of axes, specifically using an angle θ of 30 degrees. The original equation, 13x² + 6√3xy + 7y² – 32 = 0, was simplified but still resulted in a negative 6xy term. The participants concluded that proper calculation and substitution are crucial, and if an xy-term remains, it indicates an error in earlier steps. The correct rotation angle can be determined using the formula tan(2θ) = b/(a-c) for effective elimination of the xy-term.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conic sections and their standard forms
  • Familiarity with rotation of axes in coordinate geometry
  • Knowledge of trigonometric identities and their applications
  • Ability to perform algebraic manipulations and simplifications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the rotation formulas for conic sections
  • Learn about the classification of conic sections based on their equations
  • Explore the implications of degenerate conics in geometric contexts
  • Practice solving various conic section equations to reinforce understanding
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on algebra and geometry, as well as anyone involved in advanced studies of conic sections and their properties.

orcbum
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
"Rotate the axes to eliminate the xy-term in the equation. Then write the equation in standard form. (Use xp for x and yp for y' in your answer. Rotate the coordinate axes through an angle θ with 0 ≤ θ ≤ π/2.)"

13x2 + 6√3xy + 7y2 – 32 = 0

I figured out that θ is 30 degrees. After simplifying I still could not eliminate the xy-term: I ended up with:

10x2 - 6xy + 10y2 + 3(sqrt(3))x2 - 3(sqrt(3))y2 -32 = 0

note: the x and y terms above are in prime form (I just don't know how to show that on a forum)

As you can see I still have a negative 6xy. Considering the previous HW questions I've solved eliminated the xy terms easily, I'm at a loss with what to do should I encounter leftover xy terms.

Thanks in advance.

EDIT: You know this always happens to me, whenever I just ask a question/post one, I've solved it. I'm sorry, but I've figured it out now. (Calculating an earlier step incorrectly).

However, a question still stands. Provided the equation doesn't solve out neatly and has left over xy terms, is there a way around it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
orcbum said:
...
However, a question still stands. Provided the equation doesn't solve out neatly and has left over xy terms, is there a way around it?

An appropriate rotation of axes enables us to eliminate the $xy$-term in:

(1) $$ax^2+bxy+cy^2+dx+ey+f=0$$

and obtain an equation of the form:

(2) $$AX^2+CY^2+DX+EY+F=0$$

If (2) defines a real locus of points other than a point, a line, or a pair of intersecting lines, its graph will then be a conic section. The cases: a point, a line, and a pair of intersecting lines are said to be degenerate conics.

Consider:

$$x=C\cos(\theta)-Y\sin(\theta)$$

$$y=X\sin(\theta)+Y\cos(\theta)$$

Substituting these equations into (1) and simplifying reveal that the coefficient of the $XY$-term are zero provided that:

$$2(c-a)\sin(\theta)\cos(\theta)+b\left(\cos^2(\theta)-\sin^2(\theta) \right)=0$$

or equivalently:

(3) $$(a-c)\sin(2\theta)=b\cos(2\theta)$$

Notice that if $a=c$ in (1), then $a-c=0$ in (3). The resulting equation, $\cos(2\theta)=0$ implies that a rotation angle of $\theta=\dfrac{\pi}{4}$ will eliminate the $xy$-term in (1).

However, if $a\ne c$, then this elimination can be accomplished by choosing $\theta$ to be an angle for which:

$$\tan(2\theta)=\frac{b}{a-c}$$
 
orcbum said:
EDIT: You know this always happens to me, whenever I just ask a question/post one, I've solved it. I'm sorry, but I've figured it out now. (Calculating an earlier step incorrectly).

However, a question still stands. Provided the equation doesn't solve out neatly and has left over xy terms, is there a way around it?
There are some derivations that come out "smoothly." The one in your example here is what I call "fussy": it is easy to make a mistake and can be very hard to find. If you do the job correctly there will not be an xy term. If you have one left over then you have made a mistake somewhere.

The only advice I can give here is to write out every single step. All of them. One step, one term at a time. It's a pain in the pah-tootie but you can find any mistakes easier this way.

-Dan
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
15K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K