Elliptical orbits and focal points

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Agent M27
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Focal Orbits Points
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the characteristics of elliptical orbits, specifically the focal points associated with them. The Sun serves as one focal point for all planets, while the second focal point lacks physical significance and is merely a coordinate in space. The conversation highlights the relevance of Lagrangian points, such as L1 and L2, which have practical applications in space missions. Additionally, the presence of other celestial bodies, such as moons, complicates the dynamics of orbits, moving them away from ideal elliptical shapes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of elliptical geometry and its properties
  • Familiarity with Newtonian mechanics and the two-body problem
  • Knowledge of Lagrangian points and their significance in orbital mechanics
  • Basic concepts of celestial mechanics and orbital dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical formulation of elliptical orbits in celestial mechanics
  • Explore the significance and applications of Lagrange points in space missions
  • Study the effects of multiple celestial bodies on orbital paths and stability
  • Learn about the precession of orbits and its implications in astrophysics
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy enthusiasts, astrophysicists, students studying celestial mechanics, and professionals involved in space mission planning will benefit from this discussion.

Agent M27
Messages
169
Reaction score
0
I was recently studying elliptical orbits and the precession of the perihelion of Mercury. I remembered from my pre-calc class that all ellipses have two focal points. In this case the obvious would be the Sun as on focal point for all the planets, but where would the second be? I have a feeling it is something simillar to the Lagrangian points in that there is no concentration of anything, just a point in coordinate space relative to the repective bodies, i.e. L1 for Earth-Sun. Of course there would be a different focal point for each orbit. How might this point be affected if at all, by the presence of another body such as a moon. I don't know if this is a valid question or not due to the space being 3 dimensional and the material to which I am referring was dealing with 2 dimensional ellipses, but I had no idea how to word that in google or the search. Thanks in advance everyone.

Joe
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
there is no concentration of anything, just a point in coordinate space relative to the repective bodies
Yes, there is nothing special at the second focal point. Precession will change its position with time.
 
Agent M27 said:
n this case the obvious would be the Sun as on focal point for all the planets, but where would the second be? I have a feeling it is something simillar to the Lagrangian points in that there is no concentration of anything, just a point in coordinate space relative to the repective bodies, i.e. L1 for Earth-Sun.
The other focal point has zero physical meaning. In contrast, the Lagrange points have a very real and very practical physical meaning. Several of the space agencies around the world take advantage of the Lagrange points. For example, the http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/about/orbit.html" is in a Lissajous orbit the about the Sun-Earth L1 point. Several vehicles similarly take advantage of the Sun-Earth L2 point.

How might this point be affected if at all, by the presence of another body such as a moon. I don't know if this is a valid question or not due to the space being 3 dimensional and the material to which I am referring was dealing with 2 dimensional ellipses, but I had no idea how to word that in google or the search.
As soon as you move from the ideal world of the two body problem in Newtonian mechanics to the real world with the Sun, [strike]nine[/strike] eight planets, a bunch of dwarf planets, and an even larger number of small bodies, orbits are no longer ellipses. They aren't even planar. The Lagrange points are still real.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K