Undecided Guy
- 15
- 0
Hey, I know this is commonly a homework question, but it came up in my own studies; so this isn't a homework question for me. I hope it's alright that I put it here.
I'm trying to show that if [itex]f dx = d\lambda[/itex] for some [itex]f \in L^1(\mathbb{R}^d)[/itex] and complex Borel measure [itex]\lambda[/itex] then [itex]|f| dx = d|\lambda|[/itex] (i.e., [itex]f \to fdx[/itex] is an isometry).
What I've done so far is constructed a [itex]\psi \in L^1(\lambda)[/itex] so that [itex]\psi d\lambda = d|\lambda|[/itex] with [itex]|\psi| = 1[/itex]. So we then have that [itex]f \psi dx = \psi d\lambda = d|\lambda|[/itex], so it looks like what I need to show is that [itex]f \psi = |f|[/itex]. I'm not really sure how to do that though.
I'm trying to show that if [itex]f dx = d\lambda[/itex] for some [itex]f \in L^1(\mathbb{R}^d)[/itex] and complex Borel measure [itex]\lambda[/itex] then [itex]|f| dx = d|\lambda|[/itex] (i.e., [itex]f \to fdx[/itex] is an isometry).
What I've done so far is constructed a [itex]\psi \in L^1(\lambda)[/itex] so that [itex]\psi d\lambda = d|\lambda|[/itex] with [itex]|\psi| = 1[/itex]. So we then have that [itex]f \psi dx = \psi d\lambda = d|\lambda|[/itex], so it looks like what I need to show is that [itex]f \psi = |f|[/itex]. I'm not really sure how to do that though.