What Is the Empirical Formula for Tetrodotoxin?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronomer1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The empirical formula for tetrodotoxin is confirmed as C11H17N3O8, derived from combustion analysis of 18.34 mg of the toxin, which produced specific amounts of carbon dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, and water. The LD50 for a 70 kg person is calculated to be 700 micrograms, based on the lethal dose of 10 micrograms/kg body weight. Initial confusion arose from a miscalculation, but upon re-evaluation, the correct empirical formula was established. The molar mass of tetrodotoxin is 319 g/mol, and Avogadro's number is relevant for mole-to-molecule conversions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of combustion reactions and stoichiometry
  • Knowledge of empirical formula calculation methods
  • Familiarity with molar mass and Avogadro's number
  • Basic principles of toxicology, specifically LD50 calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study combustion analysis techniques for organic compounds
  • Learn detailed methods for calculating empirical formulas
  • Research the significance of Avogadro's number in chemical calculations
  • Explore toxicology principles, focusing on dosage calculations and effects of toxins
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, toxicologists, and professionals involved in pharmacology or environmental science will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the properties and calculations related to toxic substances like tetrodotoxin.

Astronomer1
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
1. The Question: The pufferfish is an Asian delicacy, but also contains a deadly toxin, tetrodotoxin. The LD50 (lethal dose to kill 50% of the population) is 10 micrograms/kg. An analysis of 18.34 mg of tetrodoxin produced 27.82 mg of carbon dioxide, 13.2 mg of nitrogen dioxide, and 8.83 mg water in a combustion reaction.

a) Determine the empirical formula for tetrodotoxin. b) What mass of tetrodotoxin is the LD50 for a 70kg person?


2. The answer is C11H17N3O8, but I'm not getting it.

After converting to mass, and then back to moles, then dividing by the smallest # of moles, and then multiplying by the factor ("common denominator") that gives all integer values...I'm not getting what I'm supposed to be getting. I've also checked 5 times to make sure I'm not punching something wrong in the calculator.


3. I'm not going to type out the WHOLE thing of how I arrived to my answer, cause it took about one page of writing to arrive at the answer. But I'm not getting C11H17N3O8 for the empirical formula, I keep getting C11H17N5O6 which is WRONG. Not sure what I'm doing wrong, but if someone could help me, that would be great. Thanks! (I've attempted this question 5-6 times already, and keep getting the same WRONG answer.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could show the reaction which results from the combustion of TD. There may be a mistake there. If you don't show something, you can't expect help.
 
Your calculation seems to be right. Maybe your teacher misread a 5 for a 3 when setting up the exercise.
 
I got N5 as well.
 
Thanks everyone. It turns out that the teacher made an error in 1 of the masses. So the empirical formula (re-calculated) IS still C11H17N3O8. But now I'm stuck on Part b. I calculated the molar mass of tetrodotoxin which is 319g/mol. Does Avogradro's # play a role here in the calculation? I'm clueless again.
 
There's 1 Avogadro's number of molecules in a mole, if that's what you are asking. That works for any substance.

For part b, you are given the LD50 dosage (10 micrograms/kg body weight) How much toxin is required for the LD50 dosage if a person has a mass of 70 kg (This can be solved by looking at the units)
 
700 micrograms? I don't know...
 
Fine. Give him a whole gram. He'll be deader than last week's news.

The point about deadly toxins is, it doesn't take a whole lot of it to kill someone.
 
700 μg it is.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
14K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
14K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 100 ·
4
Replies
100
Views
13K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K