Endothermic and Threshold reactions - Are they Equivalent?

AI Thread Summary
Endothermic and threshold reactions are not equivalent; a threshold reaction requires a specific energy to proceed, while an endothermic reaction absorbs energy. The reaction 10B(n,2*alpha)T is identified as a threshold reaction but is also exothermic, with a positive Q-value of approximately 0.335 MeV. This indicates that it does not require energy input to occur, contradicting the initial assumption of equivalence. The discussion clarifies that the term "threshold reaction" typically implies a negative Q-value, necessitating energy input for the reaction to proceed. Understanding the nuances of reaction energy and kinematics is crucial in distinguishing these concepts.
Michal Kovac
Messages
3
Reaction score
2
Hi,

up to this day I thought that endothermic and threshold reactions are equivalent. I mean each endothermic reaction must be threshold and each threshold reactions must be endothermic. But I think I was wrong.
Here is example (from this source Q-value):

10B(n,2*alpha)T

This threshold reaction of fast neutron with an isotope 10B is the main way, how radioactive tritium in primary circuit of all PWRs is generated. 10B is the principal source of radioactive tritium in primary circuit of all PWRs (which use boric acid as a chemical shim).
direct-nuclear-reaction.png


So, this is a threshold reaction and at the same time it is the exothermic reaction, because:

Using the mass-energy equivalence, the Q-value of this reaction is:

Q = {(10.0129+1.00866) [amu] – (3.01604+2 x 4.0026) [amu]} x 931.481 [MeV/amu]

= 0.00036 x 931.481 = 0.335 MeV

Is this consideration right?

I think this reaction is considered to be threshold because of its cross-section:

Figure of reaction cross-section.

upload_2016-9-14_19-35-1.png


But does anybody know, why the reaction cross-section have a threshold at 1.2 MeV??
Can it be derived from some reaction kinematics or it is "simply" some quantum behaviour of 10B nucleus??
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Michal Kovac said:
But does anybody know, why the reaction cross-section have a threshold at 1.2 MeV??
Can it be derived from some reaction kinematics or it is "simply" some quantum behaviour of 10B nucleus??
Look at the reaction cross-section and energy for 10B(n,α)7Li and also the binding energy of 7Li <-> T + α.

What energy is necessary to dissociate 7Li into T + α?

It's a QM thing. There is both total energy (kinetic and rest mass) and momentum to consider.
 
I happened to stumble across this (old) question and, since the premise of the question is incorrect, I thought I should comment.

The reaction ##^{10}B(n,\alpha)^7Li## has a positive ##Q##-value (of about 2.8 MeV). This means it is exoergic (or, as it's sometimes written, exothermic -- I think either is OK). And therefore it is not a "threshold reaction," by which we universally mean that the reaction has a negative ##Q##-value. For reactions with ##Q<0## one must supply (kinetic) energy to the particles in the initial state to get the reaction to 'go.'
 
sirapwm said:
I happened to stumble across this (old) question and, since the premise of the question is incorrect, I thought I should comment.

The reaction ##^{10}B(n,\alpha)^7Li## has a positive ##Q##-value (of about 2.8 MeV). This means it is exoergic (or, as it's sometimes written, exothermic -- I think either is OK). And therefore it is not a "threshold reaction," by which we universally mean that the reaction has a negative ##Q##-value. For reactions with ##Q<0## one must supply (kinetic) energy to the particles in the initial state to get the reaction to 'go.'
This comment was not well constructed originally by me. The original question was about the equivalence of the terms "endothermic" and "threshold reaction" using the reaction ##^{10}B(n,2\alpha)^3H## as an example. And then I muddied the waters by using a different reaction, ##^{10}B(n,\alpha)^7Li## as an example. Sorry about this.

The answer is, "yes" -- endothermic and threshold reaction are completely equivalent. They are each statements of the fact that the reaction requires energy to proceed. Endothermic refers to the (non-zero, positive) amount of energy required in the center of mass frame. "Threshold reaction" is the same statement but the implicit, perhaps, assumption is that we're talking about the projectile energy in the lab frame.

For the reaction ##a + A \to b + B##, the center of mass energy for the threshold reaction "to go" is: ##E_c > Q##, where ##Q = m_a + m_A - (m_b + m_B)##. In the laboratory frame, where the target "A" is at rest, the projectile energy must be: $$E_a = \frac{-Q(2m_{aA} + (-Q))}{2m_A}.$$ Here, ##m_{aA} = m_a + m_A##.

I'm not sure where the figure in the OP with "##E_k > 1.2 MeV##" comes from but it is incorrect if we assume that ##E_k## is the energy of the neutron in the lab frame (with the ##^{10}B## at rest). The attachment generated here) shows that the correct value for ##Q_{^{10}B(n,2\alpha)^3H} \approx 0.322## MeV > 0, meaning it is both exothermic and not a threshold reaction.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2024-05-21 at 9.59.37 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2024-05-21 at 9.59.37 AM.png
    8.1 KB · Views: 78
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...

Similar threads

Replies
50
Views
9K
Back
Top