Energy Calculations please check work (thanks)

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 5K views
blackout85
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
Please someone check to see if on the right track:

A woman lifts a barbell 2.0m in 5.0s, beginning and ending at rest. If she lifts the same distance in 10s, the work done by her is:

I said it would be four times as much because I used 1/2mv^2. I placed the v I calculated from v=d/t into the kinetic equation. (.4)^2 (.2)^2
.16 is four times as much as .04. Is this right.

A 2kg block is thrown upward from a point 20m above the Earth's surface. At what height above the Earth's surface will the gravitational potential energy of the earth-block systme have increased by 500J.

work:

mgh= 2(9.81)(20m)= 392.4 --> potential
500J= mgh
500J = (2kg)(9.81) (h)
h= 25m

If someone could point me in the right direction of how to do this problem I would appreciate it. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
blackout85 said:
Please someone check to see if on the right track:

A woman lifts a barbell 2.0m in 5.0s, beginning and ending at rest. If she lifts the same distance in 10s, the work done by her is:

I said it would be four times as much because I used 1/2mv^2. I placed the v I calculated from v=d/t into the kinetic equation. (.4)^2 (.2)^2
.16 is four times as much as .04. Is this right.

I don't think so - I think the work will be the same - Work Done = Force x distance - taking longer means less power but the same work.

A 2kg block is thrown upward from a point 20m above the Earth's surface. At what height above the Earth's surface will the gravitational potential energy of the earth-block systme have increased by 500J.

work:

mgh= 2(9.81)(20m)= 392.4 --> potential
500J= mgh
500J = (2kg)(9.81) (h)
h= 25m

If someone could point me in the right direction of how to do this problem I would appreciate it. Thank you.

This one I think is correct - except the actual height is 45, you need to add the 20m you started with.. When you're as close to the Earth as this, the mgh formula is fine.