Energy Conservation in an expanded 1D box

  • Thread starter dLo R6
  • Start date
  • #1
3
0
I am fairly new to QM and am learning many of the basics right now. We were just discussing conservation of operators (energy, momentum, etc) and I recalled a problem proposed in my textbook about a 1D particle in a box of length L. at a time t, the box suddenly expands to t=2L, in which time the wavefunction does not have time respond. it asked if energy (more specifically, <H>) was conserved during the time that the wall moves.

i'm assuming that the laws of conservation aren't broken and that the Hamiltonian does not change. but then does the fact that the box expanded at a specific time, mean that then the potential V(x) is now a function of time? so then is energy is not conserved since I have to consider the potential in the Hamiltonian now?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
3
0
OK now I'm assuming that since the box changes, the potential does change and thus <H> is not equal to <H'>. Is this correct?
 
  • #3
Avodyne
Science Advisor
1,396
88
That's correct. An external force moved the wall, doing work on the system, so the energy of the system is not conserved.
 
  • #4
499
2
Yes, technically your potential is now a function of time, but you don't want to solve the time-dependent schrodinger equation. Because the wavefunction dosen't change, Your old wavefunction is a superposition of your new set of wavefuncitons describing your new ISW potential.
 

Related Threads on Energy Conservation in an expanded 1D box

  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
661
Replies
1
Views
731
Replies
2
Views
914
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
970
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
683
Top