Energy Content of Steam: Variation with Pressure

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the cost per ton of steam at varying pressures, specifically comparing 200 bar steam at $6.09/ton to 10 bar steam at $7.17/ton using the TLV steam cost calculator. The user questions the apparent contradiction between the higher energy content of high-pressure steam and its lower cost. Key assumptions include the use of saturated steam and feed water at 90°C, with coal priced at $70/ton and a calorific value of 5600 kcal/kg. The user is encouraged to verify their calculations against steam tables for vapor enthalpy at the specified pressures.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of steam properties and thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with TLV steam cost calculator
  • Knowledge of vapor enthalpy and steam tables
  • Basic principles of energy cost calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review steam tables for vapor enthalpy at various pressures
  • Investigate the efficiency differences between low and high pressure boilers
  • Explore the impact of feed water temperature on steam cost
  • Analyze the relationship between calorific value and energy unit cost
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, steam system designers, and energy analysts looking to optimize steam cost and efficiency in industrial applications.

rollingstein
Messages
644
Reaction score
16
I was playing with an online steam calculator provided by TLV, one of the bigger steam equipment vendors & the steam cost it calculates ($/ton) seems lower at high P than low Pressure.

http://www.tlv.com/global/TI/calculator/steam-unit-cost.html

e.g. The $/ton of 200 bar steam seems 6.09 vs 7.17 for 10 bar steam. Does this make sense? I always intuitively thought there's a whole lot energy content in high pressure steam than low pressure. So why would the cost per ton of low pressure steam be higher?

For now I'm ignoring the relative efficiencies of low and high pressure boilers, differential losses etc.

I assumed saturated steam for both cases and feed water at 90 C which seem reasonable assumptions.

Coal I assumed was $70/ton with a calorific value of 5600 kcal/kg. i.e. Energy unit cost of 0.0125 $/Mcal

Do any of my assumptions seem unreasonable? Or a bug in my calculations?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Check your steam tables for the vapor enthalpy at the two pressures.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
6K