Energy Eigenstates of a Perturbed Quantum Harmonic Oscillator

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the energy eigenstates of a perturbed quantum harmonic oscillator, focusing on the Hamiltonian's structure and the implications of perturbation on energy levels.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the construction of Hamiltonians for the x and y directions, the introduction of perturbation terms, and the use of raising and lowering operators. Questions arise regarding the presence of these operators in energy eigenvalues and the implications of the perturbed frequencies on the system's energy states.

Discussion Status

Some participants suggest that the Hamiltonian can be interpreted as two independent harmonic oscillators, which may simplify the analysis. There is acknowledgment of the potential for expressing total energy without further calculations, while others express uncertainty about the role of perturbation in the energy eigenvalues.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities introduced by perturbation and the definitions of the operators involved. The discussion reflects on the assumptions regarding the independence of the oscillators and the effects of perturbation on energy levels.

PChar
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(See attachment)

Homework Equations



x = \sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m \omega}} ( a + a^{\dagger} )

x = i \sqrt{\frac{\hbar m \omega}{2}} ( a^{\dagger} - a )


The Attempt at a Solution



In part a) I was able to construct a separable Hamiltonian for the harmonic oscillators in the x and y direction.

The x Hamiltonian includes the term - \frac{λ x'^{2}}{2}

and the y Hamiltonian includes the term \frac{λ y'^{2}}{2}

Before moving on to part b), at my professor's advice, I collected the squared terms like so:

(for x): \frac{m}{2} ( \omega^{2} - \frac{λ}{m} ) x'^{2}

Calling the term within the brackets α (for y I called it β since there is a + instead of a -)

moving on to part b) I attempted to solve for the energy states by expressing all of the position and momentum operators in terms of the raising and lowering operators.

(for x) after expanding:

H_{x'} = -\frac{\hbar \omega}{4}(a_{x'}^{\dagger 2} - a_{x'}a_{x'}^{\dagger}- a_{x'}^{\dagger}a_{x'} + a_{x'}^{2}) + \frac{\hbar \omega}{4α}(a_{x'}^{2} + a_{x'}a_{x'}^{\dagger} + a_{x'}^{\dagger}a_{x'} + a_{x'}^{\dagger 2})

After simplifying using the commutator between a and a dagger and a few steps of algebra:

H_{x'} = \frac{\hbar \omega}{4α} [ (2n_{x} + 1)(α + 1) + (1 - α)(a_{x'}^{\dagger 2} + a_{x'}^{2})]

I'm pretty sure I can't have those raising and lowering operators in my energy eigenvalues but I can't see any way to eliminate them, I know that in the unperturbed oscillator, the squared terms from the position and momentum operators will cancel, but the alpha and beta are causing problems.

Thanks in advance.
 

Attachments

  • Quantum problem.png
    Quantum problem.png
    22 KB · Views: 784
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, PChar.

In terms of the primed quantities, doesn't the Hamiltonian have the form of two independent harmonic oscillators? The x'-oscillator will have ω' = √(ω2-λ/m) and the y-oscillator will have ω'' = √(ω2+λ/m). If so, then you should be able to write out the total energy of the system without really doing any more work.

If you do want to introduce raising and lowering operators, I think they would have the form that you gave below for the unprimed variables except ω would be replaced by ω' for the x’-oscillator and ω'' for the y’-oscillator.

PChar said:
x = \sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m \omega}} ( a + a^{\dagger} )

p = i \sqrt{\frac{\hbar m \omega}{2}} ( a^{\dagger} - a )
 
Ah, figures I would try do it the hard way.

So it seems like my energy eigenvalues will be:

E_{n} = \hbar \omega ' (n_{x} + \frac{1}{2}) + \hbar \omega '' (n_{y} + \frac{1}{2} )

Which should also answer the question about degeneracy, there is none due to the ω' and ω" indicating which component (x and y) of the oscillator is at which energy level.
 
Yes, that looks right. Good.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K