Energy in the LHC beam at any time

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter smallphi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Energy Lhc Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The average energy in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) beam at full power and peak luminosity is approximately 724 MJ or 201 kWh, equivalent to the energy produced by burning 5 gallons of gasoline. This energy is sufficient to boil two tons of water, but not enough to create a black hole, which would require 8 nanograms of relativistic protons. The discussion highlights the misconception surrounding the energy levels in the LHC and their implications for black hole formation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of particle physics and energy calculations
  • Familiarity with the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and its operational parameters
  • Knowledge of relativistic protons and their energy levels
  • Basic concepts of luminosity and its significance in particle collisions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the energy calculations involved in particle physics experiments
  • Learn about the operational principles of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
  • Explore the implications of relativistic physics on energy and mass
  • Investigate the conditions required for black hole formation in high-energy physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in particle physics, and anyone interested in the energy dynamics of the Large Hadron Collider and its implications for theoretical physics.

smallphi
Messages
436
Reaction score
2
Can someone that has the data calculate what is the average energy in the large hadron collider beam at any moment of time. It's pretty straightforward, you have N particles which such and such speed and energy, you just sum up. I am not talking at all about the energy to support the supermagnets or the other systems, not the energy to support the beam, but the energy in the beam at fixed time.

Although the protons fly at huge speeds the energy/proton is not very significant if measure in Joules. I have no idea how many protons are circulating in the beam at any time, that would determine the total energy.

I wonder if it's enough to warm up a cup of coffee? LOL This would put all the ridiculous questions about black holes and time machines to rest ...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
https://edms.cern.ch/file/445830/5/Vol_1_Chapter_2.pdf

724 MJ or 201 kWh. Approximately equal to the energy produced by burning 5 gallons of gasoline, and enough to boil two tons of water.

That is at full power and peak luminosity. We won't see that kind of energy density till sometime in 2009.
 
smallphi said:
I wonder if it's enough to warm up a cup of coffee? LOL This would put all the ridiculous questions about black holes and time machines to rest ...
Well, we've all seen that reporters are primarily interested in what titillates, not what informs. As long as anyone with a PhD anywhere says black holes may form and that black holes are not well understood, the stage is set for dire predictions.

Your approach to putting it all in perspective is interesting though.
 
Thanks for the data hamster143 :) It's not as low as I imagined but definitely not enough to produce a black hole that will 'destroy the earth' LOL
 
That would be 8 nano grams of relativistic protons :)
 
Planck energy is 543 kWh. So if you could focus all energy in both beams in one point, you'd come pretty close to creating a black hole, even in conventional physics without extra dimensions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
15K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K