Energy of a QM system, stationary states

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the total energy of a quantum mechanical (QM) system, specifically addressing the implications of negative total energy and its relationship to stationary states. It is established that total energy can indeed be negative, particularly in bound states, as illustrated by the potential function V = -V0 for x < -a, V = 0 for |x| < a, and V = V0 for x > a. The conversation also clarifies that a wave packet with an odd initial state will remain odd over time due to the absence of even state contributions, reinforcing the concept that potential energy zero is arbitrary and can be defined based on the context of the system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly stationary states
  • Familiarity with potential energy concepts, including negative potentials
  • Knowledge of wave functions and their properties in quantum systems
  • Basic grasp of tunneling phenomena in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of negative potential energy in quantum systems
  • Study the concept of bound states in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the mathematical formulation of wave functions and their time evolution
  • Investigate tunneling effects and their significance in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics, wave function analysis, and energy states in quantum systems.

yeahhyeahyeah
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I'm pretty confused by the rules regarding the total energy, the kinetic energy, and potential of a QM system.

Does the total energy have to be positive or greater than zero? And if so, why not? I don't really understand what it means to have a negative total energy of a system I guess. I know that we treat a lot of potentials as negative, like gravitational potential, but I guess I have never found complaint with it until now.

As an example, what if you had a system described by:

V = -V0 for x< -a
0 for |x|<a
V0 for x>a

What ranges can its energy exist in? And in what range does its energy have to be for the stationary states to be physically possible (this only happens when it is a bound state?)


Lastly, this is a kind of unrelated question, but say you have a wave packet whose initial state is such that [tex]\Psi[/tex](-x) = [tex]\Psi[/tex] (x)

In other words, an odd function. Now, because of its oddness, it can only be comprised of the odd (sin functions) stationary states. If I add time evolution, since the coefficients of any even states is 0, there will NEVER in time EVER be a contribution from any even states.

So basically, if the system starts out odd/even it will remain like so forever?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The zero for potential energy is arbitrary ... for instance, we often take objects on the ground as having zero gravitational potential energy, they have positive mgh as they go higher and negative for lower than the ground. But we could equally put the zero at the top of a building or at the bottom of the sea - or at the center of the Earth. In order to get general equations, we have to do better than that and what we usually do is set the zero at the edge of the Universe ... eg. the potential energy is how much work you have to do to remove the object to infinity.

This is why you will find atomic potentials expressed as negative numbers.

In your example, you have defined the zero potential in a particular region of space.

A particle can have a negative kinetic energy if it is at position x < -a - and may tunnel slightly into the barrier at x=a. The rest of the wave reflects to give standing wave solutions.

You should be able to complete the picture for higher energies.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K