Energy of Particle: How to Calculate Joules from Temp

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysicoRaj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Particle
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The energy of a particle in joules can be calculated from its temperature using the relationship 1 eV ≈ 11605 K and 1 eV ≈ 1.6 x 10-19 J. When a mono-energetic ensemble of particles is gathered, their collective temperature can be represented as 11,605 K if each particle has an energy of 1.6 x 10-19 J. The discussion also highlights the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution as a foundational concept for understanding the kinetic energy of particles in matter, although it notes limitations when applied to plasmas and extreme states of matter.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinetic energy and its relation to temperature
  • Familiarity with the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution
  • Basic knowledge of statistical mechanics
  • Awareness of Planck's constant and its applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution in detail
  • Learn about Planck's constant and its role in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the relationship between temperature and kinetic energy in gases
  • Investigate thermalization processes in particle ensembles
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, and quantum mechanics, will benefit from this discussion.

PhysicoRaj
Gold Member
Messages
538
Reaction score
49
How 2 find out the energy of a particle in joules, given it's temperature?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
*A* particle cannot have a temperature, as temperature is a property of an ensemble of particles.

However, if you were to, theoretically, gather a mono-energetic bunch of particles all together, and moving in randomised directions, then the energy/temperature relationship is 1eV=~11605K, and one eV+~1.6E-19J, such that if all the particles each had 1.6E-19J then the ensemble would be at 11,605K.

As soon as you put all those particles together, however, they'd rapidly thermalise (if there were no other means to keep them mono-energetic) into a distribution of energies, but their ensemble temperature would still be 11,605K nothwithstanding any expansion or thermal transfer to a container, or whatever other radiative or absorption means is going on.

Let me know if that answer is helpful, or if there are any points I've not made clear.
 
Thank you for that. Temperature is the average kinetic energy of each particle in matter isn't it? So, say you take some amount of matter and heat it to X degrees. Then each constituent particle should have a Kinetic energy equal to...
Can you give me the equation for this?
 
PhysicoRaj said:
say you take some amount of matter and heat it to X degrees. Then each constituent particle should have a Kinetic energy ...

..that fits into the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell–Boltzmann_distribution

Well, that begins to break down when we start talking about plasmas and other extreme states of matter, but is your starting-point from which you can read up the variations to it, according to how interested you are at progressing your knowledge of statistical mechanics. I'll confess, beyond MB distribution I'll be struggling too, so that's about as much as I can tell you about more complex thermalising distributions.
 
Well. Then I'll switch to low temperature. Is there any equation to find out the heat, given temperature, mass, and anything other important to calculate..
 
Read the link, it should contain all you need.
 
PhysicoRaj said:
How 2 find out the energy of a particle in joules, given it's temperature?

It should come from Planck's constant I hope. :smile: (a moving particle I mean)
 
cmb said:
Read the link, it should contain all you need.

(There's no link!:biggrin:)
 
The link is in post #4, which is more than two years old, by the way. :wink:
 
  • #10
ooooh!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K