Energy of perturbed harmonic oscillator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the energy of a quantum harmonic oscillator (QHO) subjected to an electric field, represented by the potential ##\hat{V}=q\epsilon\hat{x}##. The trial state is defined as $$|\psi\rangle=|0\rangle+b|1\rangle$$, leading to the energy expression $$E=\frac{\frac{\hbar \omega}{2}+\frac{3b^2\hbar\omega}{2}+\frac{\sqrt{2}bq\epsilon}{\alpha}}{1+b^2}$$. Participants clarify the distribution of terms in the energy expectation value and correct misconceptions regarding the unperturbed energy of the state. The discussion emphasizes the importance of normalization and the nature of quantum states represented in vector spaces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum mechanics fundamentals, specifically harmonic oscillators
  • Understanding of quantum state representation using bra-ket notation
  • Familiarity with expectation values in quantum mechanics
  • Basic knowledge of perturbation theory in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of energy levels in quantum harmonic oscillators
  • Learn about perturbation theory in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the mathematical representation of quantum states using Hermite polynomials
  • Investigate the implications of electric fields on quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying quantum harmonic oscillators and perturbation theory, as well as physicists interested in the effects of external fields on quantum states.

pondzo
Messages
168
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For a quantum harmonic oscillator in an electric field, using ##\hat{V}=q\epsilon\hat{x}##, with the following trial state: $$|\psi\rangle=|0\rangle+b|1\rangle$$
Show that the energy can be written as $$E=\frac{\frac{\hbar \omega}{2}+\frac{3b^2\hbar\omega}{2}+\frac{\sqrt{2}bq\epsilon}{\alpha}}{1+b^2}$$

Homework Equations



##\hat{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}\alpha}(a^{\dagger}+a)##

The Attempt at a Solution



There are two things that are confusing me:

(1) how to distribute the brakets in the following:

##\langle \psi | ~~= \langle 0 | +b^*\langle 1 |##
##E^{(1)}_{\psi}=\frac{q\epsilon}{\sqrt{2}\alpha}\langle \psi|a^{\dagger}+a|\psi\rangle##
##~~~~~~~\stackrel{?}{=}\frac{q\epsilon}{\sqrt{2}\alpha}[(\langle 0|+b^*\langle 1|)a^{\dagger}(|0\rangle+b|1\rangle)+(\langle 0|+b^*\langle 1|)a(|0\rangle+b|1\rangle)]##
##~~~~~~~=\frac{q\epsilon}{\sqrt{2}\alpha}[\langle 0|1 \rangle+\sqrt{2}b\langle 0|2 \rangle+b^*\langle 1|1 \rangle+\sqrt{2}b^*b\langle 1|2 \rangle+b\langle 0|0 \rangle+b^*b\langle 1 |0 \rangle]##
##~~~~~~~=\frac{q\epsilon(b^*+b)}{\sqrt{2}\alpha}##

Is this how you would distribute it? I get the feeling it is completely wrong..

(2) What is the unperturbed energy of the state ##|\psi \rangle##

Would it be ##E_{\psi}^{(0)}=\frac{1}{2}\hbar\omega+\frac{3}{2}b\hbar\omega## ?

Any guidance is appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pondzo said:
Show that the energy can be written as $$E=\frac{\frac{\hbar \omega}{2}+\frac{3b^2\hbar\omega}{2}+\frac{\sqrt{2}bq\epsilon}{\alpha}}{1+b^2}$$
First of all, are you sure you copied the above equation correctly, as it says in whatever source you took from? Because if ##b## is complex, as it generally is, that equation cannot seem to be true because it will yield a complex value.
 
Hi, yes I am sure I have copied it correctly, here is a snapshot of the question. Please note I have swapped the a with b, to avoid any confusion.

Physics forum perturbation Qn.PNG


Maybe it is assumed that a is real?
 
Yeah, it seems like the question maker forgot to state that ##a## is real, otherwise the minimization problem cannot be carried out with only one equation because a complex number consists of two real numbers.
Anyway, I don't see anything wrong with
pondzo said:
(1) how to distribute the brakets in the following:

##\langle \psi | ~~= \langle 0 | +b^*\langle 1 |##
##E^{(1)}_{\psi}=\frac{q\epsilon}{\sqrt{2}\alpha}\langle \psi|a^{\dagger}+a|\psi\rangle##
##~~~~~~~\stackrel{?}{=}\frac{q\epsilon}{\sqrt{2}\alpha}[(\langle 0|+b^*\langle 1|)a^{\dagger}(|0\rangle+b|1\rangle)+(\langle 0|+b^*\langle 1|)a(|0\rangle+b|1\rangle)]##
##~~~~~~~=\frac{q\epsilon}{\sqrt{2}\alpha}[\langle 0|1 \rangle+\sqrt{2}b\langle 0|2 \rangle+b^*\langle 1|1 \rangle+\sqrt{2}b^*b\langle 1|2 \rangle+b\langle 0|0 \rangle+b^*b\langle 1 |0 \rangle]##
##~~~~~~~=\frac{q\epsilon(b^*+b)}{\sqrt{2}\alpha}##

The only small mistake lies in your calculation of the unperturbed "energy". Note that the trial function is a superposition state, therefore you cannot associate any energy eigenvalue to it. What you can do is to calculate the expectation value of energy. This is the reason why you got only ##b## in the 2nd term of ##E_{\psi}^{(0)}## instead of ##b^2## as it should be. Once you correct this and take normalization into account, you should be able to prove what is asked.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the help blue leaf! I was able to prove the statement.

I have another question, what does ##| 0\rangle## represent? is it the column vector ##(0,1,0,0,\dots)^T##? And what do these vectors actually mean? If you solve the QHO using integrals and all that ugly stuff, you find that the eigenfunctions are in the form of hermite polynomials, how are these and ##| i \rangle## related ?

If you prefer, I can start a new thread with this question.
 
State in quantum mechanics is mathematically represented by a vector in a vector space. This vector is commonly denoted as a braket ##|a\rangle## in QM. From linear algebra, an arbitrary state can be represented as a linear combination of basis states provided these basis states have the same dimensionality as the state being represented does. Now there are many vectors spaces whose basis states can be used to represent any arbitrary state of the same dimensionality as these vector spaces, one of them is the continuous position space spanned by the basis states ##|x\rangle##. If you represent an eigenstate ##|m\rangle## of a QHO in terms of ##|x\rangle##'s, the expansion coefficient ##\langle x|m \rangle## is the one which you will find to exhibit those Hermite polynomial thing.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K