Unleashing the Power of the Universe: The Mystery of Universal Energy

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter NextFeynman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Universe
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of universal energy, particularly in the context of its conservation and the implications of dark energy as the universe expands. Participants explore theoretical frameworks, speculative ideas, and the nature of energy in relation to cosmological phenomena.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether all the energy of the universe began at the same time as the universe itself.
  • One participant suggests that conservation of energy may not hold across cosmological distances, indicating uncertainty about energy conservation in the observable universe.
  • Another participant notes that ordinary matter, dark matter, and ordinary energy are interchangeable and conserved, while dark energy is increasing with the universe's expansion.
  • There is speculation about whether the universe is gaining energy as it expands, with references to theories suggesting a movement towards a singularity of infinite energy density due to dark energy.
  • Some participants express skepticism about speculative theories, particularly those related to M-Theory and the implications of dark energy on dimensionality.
  • One participant highlights that energy isn't conserved in General Relativity, explaining that there isn't a unique way to define overall energy, which complicates discussions about its conservation.
  • Concerns are raised about the speculative nature of certain claims, with calls for references to mainstream physics to support such ideas.
  • There is a discussion about the changing nature of energy components in the universe, particularly regarding light and dark energy as the universe expands.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the nature of energy conservation in the universe, with multiple competing views and speculative ideas presented. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of dark energy and the overall energy dynamics of the universe.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of energy in General Relativity, the speculative nature of some theories discussed, and the lack of consensus on the implications of dark energy.

  • #31
Drakkith said:
I believe light loses energy over time due to redshift from expansion.

I thought that total energy was conserved. Energy density of radiation decreases because the volume of the universe increases. Energy density times volume is a constant, as far as I know in a finite Universe. In an infinite Universe then energy density divided by matter density would be a constant.
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #32
ImaLooser said:
I thought that total energy was conserved. Energy density of radiation decreases because the volume of the universe increases. Energy density times volume is a constant, as far as I know in a finite Universe. In an infinite Universe then energy density divided by matter density would be a constant.
Nope. See my first post in this thread.
 
  • #33
Keep in mind some forms of energy are positive, and others [e.g., gravity] are considered negative. At the moment, negative energy appears to dominate the universe.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
763
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K