Energy Question [The Millennium Force]

  • Thread starter Thread starter IntellectIsStrength
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Force
Click For Summary
The Millennium Force, North America's tallest roller coaster, reaches a height of 94.5 m and a maximum speed of 41.1 m/s. Its total mechanical energy, calculated from potential and kinetic energy, is 1,773,105 J. Assuming a coefficient of friction of 0.2, the energy lost to thermal energy due to friction is estimated at 3,920,000 J. This results in a calculated energy loss percentage of 221.1%, indicating that the energy lost exceeds the total mechanical energy, highlighting the significant impact of friction in roller coaster dynamics. Such calculations illustrate the complexities of energy transfer in mechanical systems.
IntellectIsStrength
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
The Millennium Force, the tallest roller coaster in North America, is 94.5 m high at its highest point. The roller coaster's actual maximum speed is 41.1 m/s. What percentage of its total mechanical energy is lost to thermal energy due to friction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
IntellectIsStrength said:
The Millennium Force, the tallest roller coaster in North America, is 94.5 m high at its highest point. The roller coaster's actual maximum speed is 41.1 m/s. What percentage of its total mechanical energy is lost to thermal energy due to friction?

What do you think? According to the https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=28 you ought to post your progression. If you have absolutely no clue whatsoever, write "I have no clue whatsoever".
 


To calculate the percentage of total mechanical energy lost to thermal energy due to friction, we need to know the total mechanical energy of the roller coaster and the amount of energy lost to thermal energy. The total mechanical energy of the roller coaster is the sum of its potential energy and kinetic energy.

The potential energy of the Millennium Force at its highest point can be calculated using the formula PE = mgh, where m is the mass of the roller coaster, g is the acceleration due to gravity (9.8 m/s²), and h is the height of the roller coaster. Assuming a mass of 1000 kg, the potential energy at the highest point is 94.5 m x 1000 kg x 9.8 m/s² = 927,900 J.

The kinetic energy of the roller coaster can be calculated using the formula KE = 1/2mv², where m is the mass and v is the velocity. With a mass of 1000 kg and a velocity of 41.1 m/s, the kinetic energy is 1/2 x 1000 kg x (41.1 m/s)² = 845,205 J.

Therefore, the total mechanical energy of the Millennium Force is 927,900 J + 845,205 J = 1,773,105 J.

Now, we need to determine the amount of energy lost to thermal energy due to friction. This can be calculated using the formula E = μmgd, where μ is the coefficient of friction, m is the mass, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and d is the distance traveled. The distance traveled can be approximated as the length of the roller coaster, which is approximately 1,600 m.

Assuming a coefficient of friction of 0.2, the energy lost to thermal energy due to friction is 0.2 x 1000 kg x 9.8 m/s² x 1,600 m = 3,920,000 J.

To calculate the percentage of total mechanical energy lost to thermal energy, we divide the energy lost to thermal energy by the total mechanical energy and multiply by 100%.

Percentage = (3,920,000 J / 1,773,105 J) x 100% = 221.1%

This calculation shows that a significant amount of the roller coaster's total mechanical energy is lost to thermal energy due to friction, which is expected in any system with moving parts.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
11K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K