Energy transferred to nucleus in pair-production

AI Thread Summary
In pair production, textbooks often overlook the recoil energy of the nucleus, as it absorbs minimal energy and primarily serves to transfer momentum from the photon. The discussion raises the question of whether the nucleus could receive maximum energy when the kinetic energy of the produced electron and positron is zero, although such a scenario is unlikely. There is concern that some energy may contribute to nuclear excitation, complicating the energy distribution. The conversation emphasizes the challenge of applying energy and momentum conservation equations due to insufficient information, such as scattering angles or velocities. Ultimately, the focus remains on determining the maximum kinetic energy of the sodium atom within these constraints.
a1234
Messages
78
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
Gamma rays of 22 MeV interact with a sodium sample, resulting in a pair-production reaction, in which an electron and positron are created in the vicinity of a nucleus:
(Photon + nucleus = e- + e+ + nucleus)
What would be the maximum transfer of energy to the sodium atoms in this reaction?
Relevant Equations
E_gamma = 2m_e*c^2 + KE- + KE+ + K_nucleus
In most textbooks, the recoil energy of the nucleus is ignored as it absorbs so little energy, and since its main role in the reaction is to absorb some of the photon's momentum without absorbing much energy.
I'm tempted to say that the nucleus gets the maximum energy when the kinetic energy of the electron and positron are zero, but I don't think we'd ever see an atom with a kinetic energy of 20.978 MeV. Wouldn't some of that energy go towards nuclear excitation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure you are not over-thinking this?
 
I feel like I am. I've been staring at the energy and momentum conservation equations to try to find something more "sophisticated," but that doesn't seem to work out since we don't have enough information (e.g. the scattering angle or velocities of the electron-positron pair).
 
a1234 said:
I feel like I am. I've been staring at the energy and momentum conservation equations to try to find something more "sophisticated," but that doesn't seem to work out since we don't have enough information (e.g. the scattering angle or velocities of the electron-positron pair).
You're trying to find the maximum (kinetic) energy of the sodium atom. You've already established the criteria for that.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top