Why does the logic of negative acceleration not always indicate negative work?

In summary: However, this logic is not correct.In summary, the logic behind determining work done by acceleration is flawed.
  • #1
Altoid
4
1
Homework Statement
A cart is constrained to move along a straight line. A
varying net force along the direction of motion is exerted on
the cart. The cart’s velocity v as a function of time tis
shown in the graph above. The five labeled points divide
the graph into four sections.
During some part of the motion, the work done on the cart
is negative. What feature of the motion indicates this?
A. Speed is increasing
B. Speed is decreasing
C. Acceleration is increasing
D. Acceleration is decreasing (INCCORECT)
Relevant Equations
W = (f)(d)(cos(theta))
Knowing that negative work occurs when the force applied to an object opposes the direction of displacement, and that the direction of acceleration vector should align with the force vector, I assumed the correct answer was that the indication of negative work comes from negative acceleration, however this is incorrect, does anyone know why this logic is faulty/doesn't work?
This is the graph btw:
1681079253896.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Consider the segment between B and C. The velocity of the cart is constant, so acceleration is zero. No work is being performed there. Next consider the segment between C and D. What happens there? Is acceleration increasing, decreasing, or constant?
 
  • #3
gneill said:
Consider the segment between B and C. The velocity of the cart is constant, so acceleration is zero. No work is being performed there. Next consider the segment between C and D. What happens there? Is acceleration increasing, decreasing, or constant?
Acceleration is constant, and negative
 
  • #4
So, by your own words, "Acceleration is decreasing" is not correct, yes?
 
  • #5
gneill said:
So, by your own words, "Acceleration is decreasing" is not correct, yes?
OHHHH, Acceleration is not decreasing, speed is decreasing because their is a negative acceleration.
 
  • #6
Yes!
 
  • #7
gneill said:
Yes!
Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes gneill
  • #8
Altoid said:
Acceleration is constant, and negative
Altoid said:
OHHHH, Acceleration is not decreasing, speed is decreasing because their is a negative acceleration.
You have to be careful with "negative" acceleration. Acceleration is a vector and can be positive or negative depending on how you define your coordinate axes. The same is true about velocity. So "positive" and "negative" don't mean much because speed and work are scalar quantities that do not depend on the choice of coordinate axes. Here is a summary of how to look at it.

In one dimension, once you have defined the axes,
  1. If the velocity and the acceleration are in the same direction (positive or negative) the speed is increasing and the work done on the moving object is positive.
  2. If the velocity and the acceleration are in opposite directions (one positive and one negative) the speed is decreasing and the work done on the moving object is negative.
  3. If the acceleration is zero, the direction of the velocity does not matter, the speed stays constant and the work done on the moving object is zero.
With this in mind, it should be easy to look at any velocity vs. time graph and figure out over what interval the external force does positive and negative work.
 

1. Why does negative acceleration not always indicate negative work?

Negative acceleration refers to a decrease in velocity over time, while negative work refers to the transfer of energy from an object to its surroundings. These two concepts are not always directly related because negative acceleration does not always result in a decrease in energy. For example, an object moving in a circular motion may have negative acceleration but still maintain a constant energy level.

2. Can negative work occur without negative acceleration?

Yes, negative work can occur without negative acceleration. Negative work refers to the transfer of energy from an object to its surroundings, while negative acceleration refers to a decrease in velocity over time. An object can transfer energy to its surroundings without decreasing its velocity, such as when a ball is thrown upwards against gravity.

3. How does the direction of the force affect negative work?

The direction of the force does not necessarily determine whether negative work is being done. Negative work occurs when the force and displacement are in opposite directions, regardless of the direction of the force. For example, if a force is applied to an object in the opposite direction of its motion, negative work is still being done.

4. Is negative work always bad?

No, negative work is not always bad. It simply refers to the transfer of energy from an object to its surroundings. Negative work can be beneficial in some situations, such as when a car's brakes use friction to slow down and transfer energy to the surroundings.

5. How does the mass of an object affect negative work?

The mass of an object does not directly affect negative work. Negative work is determined by the force and displacement of an object, not its mass. However, a heavier object may require more force to achieve the same amount of negative work as a lighter object.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
56
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
912
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
819
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
585
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
348
Replies
7
Views
279
Back
Top