Engineeering Physics after Civil Engg.

  • Context: Physics 
  • Thread starter Thread starter vish22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Civil Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the potential benefits and applicability of pursuing a Master's in Engineering Physics after completing a Bachelor's in Civil Engineering. Participants explore the relevance of modern physics in civil engineering projects and consider career paths in industry, particularly in energy generation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the applicability of modern physics in civil engineering, noting limited examples such as MAGLEV trains and nuclear power plants.
  • Another participant cautions that having degrees in disjoint fields may not be favorable to employers, suggesting that a focused career path is often preferred.
  • There is a discussion about the importance of understanding job requirements and essential skills for roles that may utilize a Master's in Engineering Physics.
  • One participant raises the idea of pursuing a career in energy generation and questions whether a Master's in Engineering Physics would be beneficial in that context.
  • Another participant elaborates on the broad nature of energy generation, mentioning various sources and the competitive nature of energy research, including the need for networking and understanding industry requirements.
  • Concerns are expressed about the likelihood of being hired as an Engineering Physics graduate in specialized fields compared to candidates with more focused qualifications.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the value of a Master's in Engineering Physics for someone with a background in Civil Engineering. There are competing views on the relevance of the degree to industry roles, particularly in energy generation.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for further research into specific job roles and specializations that may benefit from a Master's in Engineering Physics, as well as the importance of networking within the industry.

vish22
Messages
33
Reaction score
1
Hey guys,I was wondering if a Masters in Engineering Physics degree would come in handy after a bachelors in Civil Engineering.
I love physics in general,especially modern physics and its applications.
I'm not too sure about modern physics applied in Civil Engineering Projects
(Other than MAGLEV trains,nuclear powerplants).
For a career,I'd rather not get into research or academia.But I'd love to work in industry.
Honestly I'm not too bothered about the field as long as it involves applications of modern physics concepts which have great scope for implementation(or good money ;)).
But since I'm almost done with Civil Engineering(dont ask me why i chose it!)right know,I'd love to know some scope of modern physics in Civil Engineering.
Please guys,do try and help me out here.I really appreciate it!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
:frown:Thanks a Lot guys
 
vish22 said:
:frown:Thanks a Lot guys

Hey vish22 and welcome to the forums.

I don't know if this would necessarily be a good decision in terms of getting jobs.

Employers prefer to have people that stick to things and have a particular focus/direction, and this can be ascertained somewhat from seeing whether you have multiple degrees and whether they are in similar or otherwise disjoint fields.

The first thing I would do is find out if any kind of specializations, job roles, industries, and so on, have requirements that really make use of this masters degree.

More importantly, you have to understand what skills are absolutely essential and really judge whether employers would hire you only on the basis of this, or whether they would hire anyone else with a different qualification that could learn the skills quickly given their backgrounds.

I think you will find that you may be worse off with more education, and you should get some really solid advice from people in the know (employers, engineers both young graduates and senior ones) after finding any relevant specializations for civil.
 
Thanks Chiro,i really appreciate it.I understand what you're saying hence i asked if an engg. physics masters could relate with Civil in any way whatsoever.Also,I'm considering a more "Energy generation" related field,would it help in that respect?
 
vish22 said:
Thanks Chiro,i really appreciate it.I understand what you're saying hence i asked if an engg. physics masters could relate with Civil in any way whatsoever.Also,I'm considering a more "Energy generation" related field,would it help in that respect?

Energy generation is a little broad because there are a variety of sources of energy that include stored and mobile-energy technologies (i.e. batteries and movable ones like generators) as well as non-mobile energy sources. The other thing is that energy research is tightly controlled in terms of resources (like much of science).

You should see, if you want to get into this, what the DOE (if you are in the states) does and find partners, networking opportunities that the DOE has at its disposal, since they watch this thing like a hawk.

Also for energy generation, you have physicists and engineers in which engineers usually apply the kinds of technologies that are often well published and well known and not in an experimental phase.

For energy research if you were to get into something more experimental/scientific like, I would see about opportunities in the national labs, defence research, existing energy conglomerates (they do spend a tiny bit on this kind of thing), and also in some of the accelerators including the linear and cyclotrons.

For engineering as opposed to pure science, I would say defence and existing conglomerates as a purely educational guess would be better to aim for, but again do your own research and check things for yourself since you are the one that will be affected by your decisions.
 
Thanks again Chiro.So yeah,even if I were to go for EP,it wouldn't be too promising because as you said,employers look for specific direction,and any type of energy generation field would easily hire specialists as opposed to EP grads.
Crap,I'm stuck with dealing with Mud!:eek: FML! :mad:
Thanks anyways,I'll try to figure out something.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K