Engineering Physics vs. Physics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the differences between majoring in Engineering Physics and Physics, particularly in the context of pursuing a PhD in physics and potential career paths. Participants explore the implications of each major on education, research opportunities, and job prospects.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that a Physics degree may be preferable for those aiming for a PhD in physics, as it allows for more physics-related electives and a deeper understanding of the subject.
  • Others argue that Engineering Physics can also lead to graduate studies in physics, provided students take sufficient upper-level physics courses, particularly in quantum mechanics.
  • Concerns about job availability and salary are raised, with some indicating that Engineering Physics may be viewed more favorably by employers, despite a potential trade-off in physics education depth.
  • A participant notes that both degrees cover similar core math and physics courses, but Engineering Physics includes additional engineering and economics courses, which may detract from physics electives.
  • One participant highlights that Engineering Physics graduates often have broader job opportunities in various engineering fields, while Physics graduates may primarily pursue research roles, which could lead to lower salaries in comparison.
  • Another participant mentions that the workload for Engineering Physics students can be heavier due to the additional engineering courses required, potentially leading to a longer time to complete the degree.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the advantages of each major, with no consensus on which is definitively better for pursuing a PhD or career opportunities. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the overall benefits of each path.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the differences in curriculum and job prospects may depend on specific university programs and individual career goals, highlighting the importance of personal circumstances in making a decision.

gsingh2011
Messages
115
Reaction score
1
What is the difference between majoring in Engineering Physics or just Physics? Other than the obvious engineering courses you would have to take... I want to do research in physics, maybe even modern physics like string theory and quantum mechanics. Is one major preferable over the other for undergrad?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If your main goal is to get a PhD in physics possibly doing research in modern physics, I would go with the Physics degree. My school doesn't have an Engineering Physics program, so I can't comment much on the differences. Depending on your school's curriculums, it probably won't matter too much which you choose. I would advise however, that if you do Engineering Physics, you should take as many upper level physics classes as you can (most importantly Quantum Mechanics) if you want to do pure physics research. I was considering the Physics and Applied Physics programs at my school, and the faculty advisor suggested that in Applied Physics I should take QM even though it isn't part of the major requirements.
 
What about job availability/salary?
 
To boil it down, yes E. Phys looks better to employers but at the expense (slightly) of your physics education. Look at the required course list, I think it is the best indicator. If you want to get a PhD in physics, I would say go with physics.

At my ugrad, which had both Physics and Engineering Physics, they were pretty much the same degree. E. Phys took some courses like intro to economics, some intro business course, and an engineering course in statics. The cost is loss of physics electives, where a physics major would normally take some courses to go more in depth in one subject - optics, astronomy, or semiconductor devices or some such. As far as jobs, I am pretty sure the word engineering looks better to employers, even if you have mostly the same classes. I saw this at career fairs in my u. grad.
 
I'm a 3rd year Engineering Physics student at UBC (Vancouver). I too spent quite a while debating between Physics and Engineering Physics before entering university. You end up taking almost all of the same core math and physics courses regardless of which program you are in. If you do a pure Physics major, you will get more physics-related electives and you will be able to learn a bit more physics in your undergrad degree. However, most engineering physics programs that I looked at give you a good number of technical electives in later years which they let you use on math and physics courses. You can probably take all of the interesting courses in a topic or two this way, but you won't get you spread them out as much as a physics degree.

The main difference between the two is that you will end up taking all of the econ and other engineering courses if you go into eng phys where as you will probably end up taking some bio and chem courses for your requirements if you are in science. Both degrees will get you into physics grad school if you do well although it is probably slightly easier with a pure physics degree.

If you aren't planning on going into grad school, the engineering degree is probably better. The nice thing about the engineering physics degree is that it is a professional degree which looks better on the resume and gets you a P. Eng. An engineering physics grad has quite a wide variety of options for jobs. I know grads who have been hired for physics, electrical engineering, mechanical engineering and computer engineering positions so there is a lot of availability for jobs. Most physics students end up in some kind of research which typically pays a lot less than the industry jobs that engineering physics students get more often.

At my school, engineering physics students typically take 7-8 courses per term since you do have to do a bunch of electrical/mechanical engineering on top of the physics/math which can be hard for some and you end up with a lot of irrelevant/useless courses. A science student will typically take 5-6 which are more focused in their field. We also take one more term to finish our degree because of the extra requirements.

I hope that this helps! If you have any more questions feel free to ask.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K