Entangled photon polarization correlation

  • Thread starter gespex
  • Start date
  • #1
56
0
Hello everyone,

I've got a quick question... Given two entangled photons, going through a polarization filter with relative angle a, what is the correlation between the two "answers" (whether the photon is blocked or let through)?
I believe it's either cos(a) or cos^2(a), but I'm not sure which of the two.

If we do the test in sequence, with the same photon, then the correlation is cos^2(a), is that correct?

Thanks in advance
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
703
13
If analyzer A is set at an angle [itex]\alpha[/itex] and analyzer B at an angle [itex]\beta[/itex] then the probability that both photons (of the entangled pair) pass the analyzer is:

[tex]P_{AB}(\alpha,\beta) = \frac{1}{2}\text{cos}^2(\alpha-\beta)[/tex]

A derivation is given in Gregor Weih's dissertation, see page 26, Eq (1.40) and (1.41). The setup is on page 25.

I'm not sure though what you mean with the second question.
 
  • #3
56
0
If analyzer A is set at an angle [itex]\alpha[/itex] and analyzer B at an angle [itex]\beta[/itex] then the probability that both photons (of the entangled pair) pass the analyzer is:

[tex]P_{AB}(\alpha,\beta) = \frac{1}{2}\text{cos}^2(\alpha-\beta)[/tex]

A derivation is given in Gregor Weih's dissertation, see page 26, Eq (1.40) and (1.41). The setup is on page 25.

I'm not sure though what you mean with the second question.
Thank you for your answer!

My second question was more a confirmation, as I'm quite sure about it. Let's say we have a photon that went through polarization filter at 0 degrees, and we have a second polarization filter at [itex]\alpha[/itex] degrees, the chance it goes through the second polarization filter is:
[tex]\text{cos}^2 \alpha[/tex]

Right?

(I like those tex tags!)
 
  • #4
703
13
Thank you for your answer!

My second question was more a confirmation, as I'm quite sure about it. Let's say we have a photon that went through polarization filter at 0 degrees, and we have a second polarization filter at [itex]\alpha[/itex] degrees, the chance it goes through the second polarization filter is:
[tex]\text{cos}^2 \alpha[/tex]

Right?

(I like those tex tags!)
Yes, correct. This is Malus's law.
 
  • #5
56
0
Thanks for your help!
 
  • #6
1,485
421
I am confused by this whole entanglement thing - on one breathe when measurement occurs, both photons assume a definite polarisation and from this point on are no longer entangled. Yet, if we measure one photon before sending the other through a polariser orientated at a certain angle (rather than vertical or horizontal), we find the results are still correlated. Or is it that, if the photon going through the 2nd polariser had a definite polarisation, even if it were not entangled the pass/fail rate is still the same as if it were entangled?
 
  • #7
DrChinese
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,361
1,151
I am confused by this whole entanglement thing - on one breathe when measurement occurs, both photons assume a definite polarisation and from this point on are no longer entangled. Yet, if we measure one photon before sending the other through a polariser orientated at a certain angle (rather than vertical or horizontal), we find the results are still correlated. Or is it that, if the photon going through the 2nd polariser had a definite polarisation, even if it were not entangled the pass/fail rate is still the same as if it were entangled?
We don't know the moment or mechanism by which entanglement ends. We can make these statements:

a) It is "as if" both take on a definite polarization when one takes on a definite polarization. There is no sense in which the ordering of that collapse matters.

b) When collapse occurs, it is not necessary that *all* entanglement ends. Just on the related bases for the measurement. For example, they could remain frequency/momentum entangled even though they are no longer polarization entangled.
 

Related Threads on Entangled photon polarization correlation

Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
286
Replies
8
Views
822
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
601
Top