Hi, it's my first time to post here.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I'm wondering how we can define "entanglement" for identical particles.

More simply, when two bosons are in the following state

( |psi (x) >|phi (y) > + |psi (y) >|phi (x) > ) ,

are they entangled or not?

I have (at least) two ideas:

1. We can define "entanglement of identical particles" only if the wave packet of each particle does not overlap (so that the two particles are distinguishable).

2. We always use the second quantization:

particles are NOT entangled if and only if the state can be written as the product of creation operators times vacuum.

(in the LaTeX style,) a_{k_1}^\dagger a_{k_2}^\dagger \cdots a_{k_N}^\dagger |vac>

The second idea comes from the following paper: http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRA/v67/i2/e024301

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Entanglement criterion for identical particle

Loading...

Similar Threads for Entanglement criterion identical |
---|

I Do macro objects get entangled? |

B Library of Babel quantum state |

B The setup of "2012 entanglement between photons that (...)" |

A Equation in a paper about Dicke states |

I Generalizing the Bell Inequality for Arbitrary Measurement Axes |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**