Entanglement Decay of a proton pair

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the entanglement of a pair of protons and the implications of proton decay on this entanglement. It is established that if one proton decays, the entanglement does not cease to exist; instead, it transforms into a new entanglement with the decay products. The notion that entanglement itself decays over time is definitively rejected. The conversation also touches on the complexities surrounding neutron decay and measurement discrepancies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum entanglement principles
  • Proton decay theory
  • Nuclear physics fundamentals
  • Measurement techniques in particle physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study quantum entanglement transformations in particle decay
  • Research proton decay mechanisms and implications
  • Examine discrepancies in neutron half-life measurements
  • Explore advanced topics in quantum mechanics and particle interactions
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics researchers, and students interested in particle physics and the nature of entanglement in subatomic particles.

sqljunkey
Messages
181
Reaction score
8
Hi,

Suppose I had a pair of protons that are entangled, and one or both of those protons decayed( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton_decay ) over time, does that mean the entanglement between the protons does not exist anymore, and would it be fair to say that the entanglement decayed over time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First catch your entangled protons.
Hang them until ripe...
;-)
Slightly off-topic: Long, long ago, my 'Nuclear & Radio-Chemistry' lecturer admitted getting drunk to silence his nagging concerns about how/why neutrons decayed with ~14 min half-life, but protons didn't seem to decay at all...

IIRC, there are still some difficulties. Not least, why measuring free-neutron half-lives two ways gives results that differ by significantly more than those careful methods' error bars...
 
sqljunkey said:
does that mean the entanglement between the protons does not exist anymore

No, it means the entanglement between proton A and proton B, if proton B decays, turns into entanglement between proton A and whatever proton B decayed into.

sqljunkey said:
would it be fair to say that the entanglement decayed over time?

No.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
928
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K