Entire Functions and Lacunary Values.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the properties of entire functions, particularly regarding their lacunary values and whether such functions can be expressed in the form of an exponential of another analytic function. Participants explore the implications of Picard's theorem and related theorems in complex analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether an entire function with a lacunary value of 0 must be expressible as ##e^{g(z)}##, where ##g(z)## is analytic.
  • Another participant presents a theorem stating that any analytic function that does not take the value 0 can be expressed as ##e^{h(z)}## for some analytic function ##h##.
  • A participant seeks clarification on whether the theorem implies that all entire functions that do not hit zero can be expressed in that form.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about whether the form ##e^{g(z)}## exhausts all possible functions with a specific lacunary value.
  • One participant emphasizes that the existence of a logarithm for entire functions that are never zero suggests a relationship, but questions if this form is comprehensive for all such functions.
  • Another participant asserts that for every non-constant entire function, there exists a corresponding function with the desired properties, indicating a bidirectional relationship.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the form ##e^{g(z)}## encompasses all entire functions with a specific lacunary value. While some agree on the existence of such representations, others question the completeness of this characterization.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the nature of lacunary values and the completeness of the proposed forms for entire functions. The discussion reflects a range of interpretations of theorems and their implications.

WWGD
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
7,804
Reaction score
13,113
#Hi All,
Let ## f: \mathbb C \rightarrow \mathbb C ## be entire, i.e., analytic in the whole Complex plane. By one of Picard's theorems, ##f ## must be onto , except possibly for one value, called the lacunary value.
Question: say ##0## is the lacunary value of ##f ##. Must ## f ## be of the form ##e^{g(z)}## , with ##g(z)## analytic?.
Clearly if ##g(z)## has no lacunary values, then ## e^{g(z)}## will have only ##0## as its lacunary value,
and if ##g(z) ## has only ##w## as its lacunary value, then this value will be assumed in ## w+i2\pi n ##, so ##0## will still be the lacunary value of ## e^{g(z)}##. Maybe we can consider composing functions with known lacunary values, but I don't see offhand how, since I don't know the lacunary values of general entire functions.
I considered using Weirstrass factorization thm, but it seems overkill and has led nowhere.
Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Theorem: Let ##D## be any elementary domain (for example ##D = \mathbb{C}##), let ##f:D\rightarrow \mathbb{C}## be an analytic function such that ##f(z) \neq 0## for each ##z\in D##, then there exist an analytic function ##h## such that ##f(z) = e^{h(z)}## for all ##z\in D##.

Proof: Let ##F## be a primitive of ##f^\prime / f##. Then put ##G(z) = \frac{e^{F(z)}}{f(z)}##. One checks easily that ##G^\prime (z) = 0## for all ##z\in D##. Therefore, ##e^{F(z)} = Cf(z)## for some nonzero constant ##C##. Since ##e^z## is surjective, we can write ##C = e^c##. Then ##h(z) = F(z) - c## does the trick.
 
Thanks, that shows the side I am aware of, but does it show that all entire functions that do not hit zero are of this form? Sorry, I know I am being lazy and using composition of entire functions would give an answer, but I wondered if someone knew the answer offhand.
 
WWGD said:
Thanks, that shows the side I am aware of, but does it show that all entire functions that do not hit zero are of this form?
They all can be expressed in that way. That's what the theorem says.
 
I don't get it, how does my answer not answer your question?
 
Sorry for not being clear: I am looking for a common way of generating/describing all such functions, I would say with an iff rule. I know that every function _can_ be expressed that way. What I meant to say is: does that form exhaust all possible functions with lacunary value 1?. I am looking for something along the lines of ##f: \mathbb C \rightarrow \mathbb C ## is an automorphism (global diffeomorphism) iff ##f(z)= az+b ##. Yes, you are right that any function ##f(z)## with ##f(z)## entire and never ##0## does have a logarithm ## g(z) ## in a simply-connected region so that ## e^{g(z)}=f(z) ## , but what I should have asked is whether this exhausts all possible such functions. Hope I was clearer this time
 
Sorry, I really don't get it.
 
Let me think it through and I will try to be more clear. Thanks.
 
"For every entire nonzero non-constant function f there exists g with [property]" is as exhaustive as it can get.
The other direction is also true:
For every non-constant entire g there is a non-constant nonzero entire f with f(z)=eg(z).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K