Equation of a Line in three space question

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter thomasrules
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Line Space
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the equation of a line in three-dimensional space that passes through a specific point and intersects another line at right angles. Participants explore the reasoning behind using dot products and direction vectors in this context, touching on both conceptual and technical aspects of the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses frustration over understanding the reasoning behind using the dot product in this context, questioning the need for the direction vector of the other line.
  • Another participant clarifies that you cannot take the dot product of a vector and an equation, emphasizing the importance of identifying direction vectors correctly.
  • A direction vector for the given line is identified as (3, -1, 1), and its perpendicular relationship to the vector from the point (4, 5, 5) is discussed.
  • Participants discuss the geometric interpretation of the problem, suggesting that the closest point on the given line to (4, 5, 5) is where the perpendicular intersects.
  • There is a correction regarding the representation of the direction vector, with some confusion about notation and the correct form of the vector.
  • One participant proposes a method involving parametric equations and dot products to find the intersection point, but seeks confirmation on the validity of their approach.
  • Another participant suggests drawing a diagram to better understand the relationships between the points and lines involved, advocating for visual aids in solving the problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the methods and reasoning used to approach the problem. While some clarify and correct each other’s statements, there is no consensus on the best approach to take or the reasoning behind certain steps.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the proper use of dot products and direction vectors, highlighting potential misunderstandings in mathematical notation and the geometric interpretation of the problem. There are unresolved questions about the assumptions underlying the proposed methods.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students or individuals grappling with vector mathematics, particularly in the context of three-dimensional geometry and the application of dot products in finding perpendicular lines.

thomasrules
Messages
243
Reaction score
0
This question is really pissing me off because I don't understand it. I know how to do it but don't understand the reasoning:

Find an equation of the line through the point (4,5,5) that meets the line

(x-11)/3=(y+8)/-1=(z-4)/1 at right angles.

I found out that you have to do the dot product of (4,5,5) and that equation but I don't understand why you don't need the direction vector for the other equation to find the answer. Also why couldn't you just do (4,5,5) dot (11,-8,4)?:mad:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't dot product a vector and an equation.

How're you reading off the direction vector of the line from its equation?
 
direction vector=(3,-1,1)
 
Still not entirely sure I see what the difficulty is: you know that the point where the line from (4,5,5) hits the given line perpendicularly is also the closest point to (4,5,5) on the line.
 
thomasrules said:
I found out that you have to do the dot product of (4,5,5) and that equation
No, you didn't find that out- it doesn't make sense. (4,5,5) is a point not a vector and you can't take a dot product of anything with an equation! That's one reason why its not a good idea to write a vector in the form (a,b,c). I prefer either ai+ bj+ ck or <a, b, c>.

Let (x,y,z) be the point on the given line where that perpendicular crosses. Then (x-4)i+ (y-5)j+ (z-5)k is a vector in the direction of that line. Yes, 3i- j+ 3k is a vector in the direction of the given line. Since they are perpendicular, their dot product: 3(x-4)- (y-5)+ 3(z-5)= 0.
Multiplying that out, 3x- y+ 3z= 12- 5+ 15= 22 (that may be where you got the idea that you were doing "the dot product of (4,5,5) and that equation"). That equation, together with the equations (x-11)/3=(y+8)/-1=(z-4)/1 is enough to solve for x, y, and z and then the equation of the line.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Then (x-4)i+ (y-5)j+ (z-5)k is a vector in the direction of that line. Yes, 3i- j+ 3k is a vector in the direction of the given line. Since they are perpendicular, their dot product: 3(x-4)- (y-5)+ 3(z-5)= 0.
Multiplying that out, 3x- y+ 3z= 12- 5+ 15= 22. That equation, together with the equations (x-11)/3=(y+8)/-1=(z-4)/1 is enough to solve for x, y, and z and then the equation of the line.


Ok let me show you how i think it's to be done because I don't get your part of

"That equation, together with the equations (x-11)/3=(y+8)/-1=(z-4)/1 is enough to solve for x, y, and z and then the equation of the line."

r=(11,-8,4)+t(3,-1,1)

r1=(4,5,5)+t(x,y,z)

r dot r1= (11+3t,-8-t,4+1)dot(4+x,5+y,5+z)=0


IS THAT RIGHT?

And how did you get "Yes, 3i- j+ 3k" isn't it 3i-j+k?
 
yes the vector is 3,-1,1, best is to draw a diagram with the point/Line and new point and use the projection formula to understand the above.
 
Last edited:
anyone help
 
And how did you get "Yes, 3i- j+ 3k" isn't it 3i-j+k?
That was a "miscopy".
Rewrite:
Let (x,y,z) be the point on the given line where that perpendicular crosses. Then (x-4)i+ (y-5)j+ (z-5)k is a vector in the direction of that line. Yes, 3i- j+ k is a vector in the direction of the given line. Since they are perpendicular, their dot product: 3(x-4)- (y-5)+ (z-5)= 0.
Multiplying that out, 3x- y+ z= 12- 5+ 5= 12

Now you also know (x-11)/3=(y+8)/-1=(z-4)/1 since (x, y, z) lies on that line.
From 3x- y+ z= 12, we can write z= -3x+ y+ 12 and then we have, from the equations for the line, (x-11)/3= (-3x+y+ 8) and (y+8)/-1= (-3x+y+8), two equations to solve for x and y.
 
  • #10
Plenty of help has been given, but it still isn't clear what *you* are doing i.e. your explanations of what you are doing do not make sense, we think of your claim that you know to take the dot product of sometihng with an equation.

The simplest thing to do is to draw a picture to see how to use the projection formula to get a vector parallel to the required line, and then you know a vector parallel to the desired line and a point on the line hence you konw the equation of the line.

So, draw a diagram: a long line represents the given one; mark a point not on the line to represent (4,5,5); draw a line from the point to the given line, and draw one the meets perpendicularly; think about projections using dot products etc, it is quite clear, and you shuold also attempt to bear in mind the limitations of the web as a place for explaining diagrams: it is up to you to draw one not us.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K