srujana_09
- 4
- 0
Last edited by a moderator:
The discussion revolves around determining the equation of a parabola given only two points that lie on it, neither of which is the focus or the vertex. Participants explore the implications of having insufficient points to uniquely define a parabola.
The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some have provided reasoning about the necessity of three points to define a unique parabola, while others are questioning the assumptions made about the focus and vertex.
Participants note that the general form of a parabola involves three constants, which implies that three points are needed to solve for these unknowns. There is also a clarification regarding the position of the focus in relation to the parabola.
srujana_09 said:Can we find the equation of the parabola when only two points on it are known and neither of them is the focus nor the vertex?
srujana_09 said:Can we find the equation of the parabola when only two points on it are known and neither of them is the focus nor the vertex?
I'm concerned about the way that is phrased. Do you understand that the focus of a parabola is never on the parabola?srujana_09 said:Can we find the equation of the parabola when only two points on it are known and neither of them is the focus nor the vertex?