Equation used to find kinetic energy of proton

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the appropriate equation to calculate the kinetic energy of a proton when given its wavelength, specifically in the context of whether to use a relativistic or non-relativistic approach. The scope includes theoretical reasoning and mathematical formulation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using the relationship between wavelength and momentum, lambda = h/p, and proposes two methods for calculating kinetic energy.
  • Another participant points out that the wavelength to momentum relationship is sufficient for the calculation, indicating a potential simplification.
  • A participant questions the correctness of the equation p = sqrt(2Em) and mentions deriving it earlier, reflecting uncertainty about its validity.
  • Some participants argue that method 2, which incorporates relativistic effects, is more appropriate for particles like protons, while method 1 is deemed "correct enough" only for low-energy scenarios.
  • One participant reports a significant discrepancy in results between the two methods, highlighting the importance of considering relativistic effects.
  • Another participant suggests checking calculations and units, noting that their results differ only slightly, indicating potential calculation errors in the first participant's approach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on which method to use, with some favoring the relativistic approach while others suggest the non-relativistic method may suffice under certain conditions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to take.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of missing assumptions regarding the energy levels of the proton, and the discussion reflects uncertainty about the applicability of non-relativistic versus relativistic equations based on the proton's velocity.

darksyesider
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
I am having trouble deciding when to use which equation.

If you're given the wavelength of a proton, let's say 100 fm, and have to find the kinetic energy of it, how would you do this?

Here are my ideas:

Idea 1: Use lambda = h/p, where p = sqrt(2Em).

Idea 2: Use E=(pc)^2+(mc^2)^2 = (mc^2)^2+(h/lambda * c)^2

Then I'll use:

K = E- E_o
==> (answer from idea 1 or 2) - mc^2 Which should I use? I personally think idea 2 is correct because it accounts for the relativisitic effects.

thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In your idea 1 you've already given the wavelength to momentum relationship---and you're given the wavelength. That's all you need.

Edit: looks like I misread the question...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: darksyesider
but is the equation correct?
I actually forgot how I got p = sqrt(2Em)...I think I derived it earlier in my work.

Also I asked my friend who is learning this in school and he said that you have to use idea 2 because it is a particle?
 
darksyesider said:
Which should I use? I personally think idea 2 is correct because it accounts for the relativisitic effects.

The relativistic equation is correct in general. Your method 1 is basically non-relativistic, so it's "correct enough" only for low-energy (low-velocity) particles. But it's hard to tell in advance whether the velocity is "low enough" unless you have a lot of experience in doing these kinds of problems. So I would go with your method 2. If you have time, try method 1 also and see how close together the results are.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: darksyesider
darksyesider said:
I actually forgot how I got p = sqrt(2Em)

Hint: start with the non-relativistic formulas for momentum and kinetic energy, p = mv and E = (1/2)mv2.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: darksyesider
Thank you everyone! My answer using method 2 was actually 1000 times larger than the answer using method 1. I guess you have to take into account relativity!
 
darksyesider said:
My answer using method 2 was actually 1000 times larger than the answer using method 1.

I suggest that you check your calculations and particularly your units carefully. My results for the two methods differ by only about 0.004%.

As a check, calculate the proton's speed assuming the classical formula. What % is it of the speed of light?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K