- 3,372
- 465
How can Universe be at equilibrium when the FRW metric has no time-like Killing Vector?Request: Please, move this into Cosmology thread... :( Mistakenly I posted it in HEP
Last edited:
The discussion revolves around the concept of equilibrium in the universe, particularly in relation to the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) metric and the implications of cosmic expansion on thermal properties. Participants explore the definitions and interpretations of equilibrium, large-scale homogeneity, and the slow expansion argument in cosmology.
Participants express differing views on the applicability of the term "equilibrium" in the context of the universe, with some advocating for a redefinition while others maintain the original terminology. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise nature of equilibrium in cosmological terms.
There are limitations in the discussion regarding the definitions of equilibrium and homogeneity, as well as the assumptions underlying the slow expansion argument. The implications of these concepts on the thermal properties of the universe are not fully resolved.
It's not an equilibrium in the strict sense of a final state of a system that no longer changes. What it essentially means is that the system is well-described by a thermal energy distribution.ChrisVer said:http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/db275/Cosmology/Chapter3.pdf
page:5 as you scroll down, the subnote with number 7...
I am trying to pursue a little further and understanding better what they meant in it... In fact I am looking for a better explanation on the slow expansion-argument as well..
ChrisVer said:I am looking for a better explanation on the slow expansion-argument as well..