Equilibrium constant (K) Question problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the equilibrium constant (K) for the reaction N2 + 3H2 = 2NH3 using given equilibrium concentrations. The user initially substituted the concentrations into the K expression, resulting in K = 5.6 x 10^8. Concerns were raised about the high value of K, suggesting it should be smaller. Despite the doubts, one participant confirmed that the calculated value is consistent with the provided data. The conversation highlights the importance of verifying calculations in equilibrium chemistry.
Danny523
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Finding the Equilibrium Constant (K)I have been having a bit of trouble with this question, if anyone could guide me on where I am going wrong it would be greatly appreciated!
"Reaction 1: N2 + 3H2 = 2NH3

Write down an expression for the equilibrium constant K, for reaction 1.
At 25 degrees Celsius the equilibrium concentrations of N2, H2 and NH3 gases are:

N2: 1.3 x 10^-3 mol dm^-3
H2: 1.1 x 10^-2 mol dm^-3
NH3: 9.8 x 10^-1 mol dm^-3

Use these values to calculate the value of K at this temperature"So then what I did was substitute these values into this equation:

K = (NH3)^2 / ((N2) x (H2)^3)

To give this:

K = (9.8 x 10^-1)^2 / ((1.3 x 10^-3) x (1.1 x 10^-2)^3)

That then gave me:

K = 5.6 x 10^8

Im pretty sure that is not right, I am thinking it should be a lot lot smaller...

If you could help me out I would appreciate it a lot!

Thanks

Danny
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Agreed that value looks high, but that's what you get from the data given.

--
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top