Equipotential Surfaces: Calculating Work Required to Move a Charge

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the work required to move a 3.4 x 10^-6 C charge from point E to point F across equipotential surfaces. The relevant equations include the electric potential difference (Vf - Ve = -Welec/q) and the work-energy principle. The calculated work done by the user was 2.72 x 10^-4 J, with a critical correction regarding the sign of the work, as it should be negative due to the work being done against the electric field. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of understanding the direction of forces in electric fields when calculating work.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and equipotential surfaces
  • Familiarity with Coulomb's law and the constant k = 8.99 x 10^9 N*m^2/C^2
  • Knowledge of the work-energy principle in electrostatics
  • Ability to perform calculations involving electric charge and potential difference
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of electric potential energy in electrostatics
  • Learn about the relationship between electric fields and equipotential surfaces
  • Explore the implications of negative work in electric fields
  • Practice problems involving work done on charges in various electric fields
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding electrostatics and the principles of electric potential and work in electric fields.

daimoku
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Equipotential surfaces

Homework Statement


http://personalpages.tds.net/~locowise/test/equipot1.jpg
Fig. 1 -- Some equipotential surfaces

In the figure above, you see a set of equipotentials representing an electric field in the region and some labeled points (A..G).

What is the work required by you to move a 3.4 x 10^-6 C charge from E to F?

We know k=8.99*10^9 N*m^2/C^2

Homework Equations


r = kq/v
Work = force * displacement
V2-V1=-Welec/q


The Attempt at a Solution



Calculated Re to be 196.81m and Rf to be 305.66m. <---not sure if this is necessary
Vf-Ve=-80V

-80V=-Welec/(3.4*10^-6C)
Welec comes out to be 2.72*10-4 J

Could someone point out where I made a mistake or even if I used the correct method? Many thanks for your help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
daimoku said:
Calculated Re to be 196.81m and Rf to be 305.66m. <---not sure if this is necessary
What is this? Looks like you are trying to find the radii of the two equipotential surfaces. Do they look spherical?
Vf-Ve=-80V

-80V=-Welec/(3.4*10^-6C)
Welec comes out to be 2.72*10-4 J

Could someone point out where I made a mistake or even if I used the correct method? Many thanks for your help!

The answer looks correct, except that it should have negative sign, since the work is being done by the charge.
 
Thanks a lot! You were correct-o-mundo on the negative sign!
 


The question is the work done BY ME, and NOT by the electric field. The work done by the electric field is positive as the force and displacement are in the same direction (since the charge moves from a point of higher to lower potential). Since the work is done by moving the charge without acceleration, the force given by me on the charge has to be equal and opposite to the force of the electric field on the charge. Hence the work done by me is negative.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K