Distance between equipotential surfaces

In summary, the problem involves finding the distance between two equipotential surfaces of a non-conducting sphere with a uniform charge density. After calculating the charge and using the equation for potential, the correct distances between the surfaces are found to be 1.998 m and 0.7651 m respectively, resulting in a total distance of 1.23 meters between the surfaces.
  • #1
Alan I
15
0

Homework Statement


A non-conducting sphere (radius 11.3 cm) has uniform charge density ρ = 0.596 μC/m3. Find the distance, in meters, between equipotential surfaces V1 = 16.2 Volts and V2 = 42.3 volts. (Distance is always positive.)

Homework Equations


V=kq/r
ρ=Q/V

The Attempt at a Solution


ρ=0.596*10-6 C/m3 = Q/V ⇒ (0.596*10-6)=Q/(4/3*π*(0.113m)3)
⇒Q=3.60*10-9

for V1
16.2=k(3.60*10-9)/r1
⇒r1≅0.5

for V2
42.3=k(3.60*10-9)/r2
⇒r2≅1.3

⇒r2-r1=0.807m → this answer is wrong. :oldconfused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Volts relative to what?

There are missing units.
How do you get a larger radius for the larger potential? Something got wrong with the multiplication/division there, you got the inverse values. An error that would have been easy to spot with units.
 
  • Like
Likes Alan I
  • #3
mfb said:
Volts relative to what?

There are missing units.
How do you get a larger radius for the larger potential? Something got wrong with the multiplication/division there, you got the inverse values. An error that would have been easy to spot with units.

OK thanks! I don't know how I messed up that algebra so bad. After re-checking my calculations this is what I got:

r1 m = k N*m2/C2 * (3.6*10-9) C / 16.2 N*m/C

r1 = 1.998 m

r2 m = k N*m2/C2 * (3.6*10-9) C / 42.3 N*m/C

r2=0.7651 m → smaller for the higher potential

r1-r2 = 1.23 m

Now it seems to make more sense. Thank you!
 
Back
Top