Equipotential Surfaces: Calculating Work Required to Move a Charge

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the work required to move a charge between two points on equipotential surfaces in an electric field. The original poster presents a specific scenario involving a charge of 3.4 x 10^-6 C and seeks clarification on their calculations and methodology.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the work done using the relationship between electric potential and work. They express uncertainty about the necessity of calculating the radii of the equipotential surfaces and question the correctness of their method.

Discussion Status

Participants have engaged in clarifying the signs associated with work done by the electric field versus work done by the poster. Some guidance has been provided regarding the interpretation of the work done in relation to the charge's movement through the electric field.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on distinguishing between the work done by the electric field and the work done by the individual moving the charge. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the signs in the context of electric potential and work.

daimoku
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Equipotential surfaces

Homework Statement


http://personalpages.tds.net/~locowise/test/equipot1.jpg
Fig. 1 -- Some equipotential surfaces

In the figure above, you see a set of equipotentials representing an electric field in the region and some labeled points (A..G).

What is the work required by you to move a 3.4 x 10^-6 C charge from E to F?

We know k=8.99*10^9 N*m^2/C^2

Homework Equations


r = kq/v
Work = force * displacement
V2-V1=-Welec/q


The Attempt at a Solution



Calculated Re to be 196.81m and Rf to be 305.66m. <---not sure if this is necessary
Vf-Ve=-80V

-80V=-Welec/(3.4*10^-6C)
Welec comes out to be 2.72*10-4 J

Could someone point out where I made a mistake or even if I used the correct method? Many thanks for your help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
daimoku said:
Calculated Re to be 196.81m and Rf to be 305.66m. <---not sure if this is necessary
What is this? Looks like you are trying to find the radii of the two equipotential surfaces. Do they look spherical?
Vf-Ve=-80V

-80V=-Welec/(3.4*10^-6C)
Welec comes out to be 2.72*10-4 J

Could someone point out where I made a mistake or even if I used the correct method? Many thanks for your help!

The answer looks correct, except that it should have negative sign, since the work is being done by the charge.
 
Thanks a lot! You were correct-o-mundo on the negative sign!
 


The question is the work done BY ME, and NOT by the electric field. The work done by the electric field is positive as the force and displacement are in the same direction (since the charge moves from a point of higher to lower potential). Since the work is done by moving the charge without acceleration, the force given by me on the charge has to be equal and opposite to the force of the electric field on the charge. Hence the work done by me is negative.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K