MHB Equivalence of Norms in R^n .... D&K Corollary 1.8.10 .... ....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equivalence
Click For Summary
Corollary 1.8.10 in Duistermaat and Kolk's "Multidimensional Real Analysis I: Differentiation" defines equivalent norms on the finite-dimensional vector space R^n, stating that two norms are equivalent if there exist positive constants c1 and c2 such that c1μ(x) ≤ ν(x) ≤ c2μ(x). This equivalence implies that theorems proved in R^n remain valid regardless of which equivalent norm is used. The discussion emphasizes the significance of this property in understanding the continuity and behavior of functions in multidimensional spaces. The participants seek clarity on how this equivalence affects the application of theorems in analysis. Understanding this concept is crucial for deeper insights into the structure of finite-dimensional spaces.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading "Multidimensional Real Analysis I: Differentiation" by J. J. Duistermaat and J. A. C. Kolk ...

I am focused on Chapter 1: Continuity ... ...

I need help with an aspect of Corollary 1.8.10 ... ...

Duistermaat and Kolk's Corollary 1.8.10 and the preceding notes and results read as follows:View attachment 7743In the notes after Theorem 1.8.8 above we read the following:

" ... ... A useful application of this theorem is to show the equivalence of all norms on the finite-dimensional vector space $$\mathbb{R}^n$$. ... ... "My question is as follows:

How/why does Corollary 1.8.10 show the "equivalence" of all norms on the finite-dimensional vector space $$\mathbb{R}^n$$. ... ... in what sense is this meant?

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
How/why does Corollary 1.8.10 show the "equivalence" of all norms on the finite-dimensional vector space $$\mathbb{R}^n$$.
Corollary 1.8.10 states the definition of equivalent norms. Two norms $\mu(x)$ and $\nu(x)$ are called equivalent if there exist positive numbers $c_1$ and $c_2$ such that $c_1\mu(x)\le\nu(x)\le c_2\mu(x)$.
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
Corollary 1.8.10 states the definition of equivalent norms. Two norms $\mu(x)$ and $\nu(x)$ are called equivalent if there exist positive numbers $c_1$ and $c_2$ such that $c_1\mu(x)\le\nu(x)\le c_2\mu(x)$.

Hi Evgeny ... thanks for the help ...

Can you go further and state that equivalent norms means that the theorems proved in $$\mathbb{R}^n$$ are essentially unchanged when the norm is changed to an equivalent one ...

Peter
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K