MHB Equivalence Relations: Explaining $I_A$, $\rho^{-1}$ and $\rho \circ \rho$

Click For Summary
In the discussion on equivalence relations, the properties of reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity are examined through the relations $I_A \subset \rho$, $\rho^{-1} = \rho$, and $\rho \circ \rho \subset \rho$. It is emphasized that using concrete examples can clarify whether these properties hold. For instance, the relation defined by $m \mathrel{\rho} n \iff m \le n$ on natural numbers demonstrates that $\rho^{-1} \not\subseteq \rho$, indicating a lack of symmetry. The discussion also notes that $\rho^{-1} = \rho$ is equivalent to $\rho^{-1} \subseteq \rho$. Understanding these properties is crucial for grasping the nature of equivalence relations.
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hi again! (Smile)

If $\rho$ is an equivalence relation, could you explain me why the following relations stand? (Thinking)

  • $I_A \subset \rho$
  • $\rho^{-1}=\rho$
  • $\rho \circ \rho \subset \rho$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
These three conditions correspond to reflexivity, symmetry and transitivity, respectively. Again, I would recommend taking some concrete relations (ideally, those where these properties hold and where they don't) and determine whether the properties you listed hold. This will help build intuition.

For example, let $m\mathrel{\rho}n\iff m\le n$ on natural numbers. Then $\langle 3,5\rangle\in\rho$, but $\rho^{-1}\ni\langle 5,3\rangle\notin\rho$; therefore, $\rho^{-1}\not\subseteq\rho$. The same fact is expressed by saying that $3\le 5$, but $5\not\le 3$. Both these statements mean that $\rho$ is not symmetric. Note, by the way, that $\rho^{-1}\subseteq\rho$ is equivalent to $\rho^{-1}=\rho$ for any $\rho$ because $\rho^{-1}\subseteq\rho$ implies that $(\rho^{-1})^{-1}\subseteq\rho^{-1}$, i.e., $\rho\subseteq\rho^{-1}$.
 
There is a nice little variation of the problem. The host says, after you have chosen the door, that you can change your guess, but to sweeten the deal, he says you can choose the two other doors, if you wish. This proposition is a no brainer, however before you are quick enough to accept it, the host opens one of the two doors and it is empty. In this version you really want to change your pick, but at the same time ask yourself is the host impartial and does that change anything. The host...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K