MHB Equivalent Damping Constant for Massless Bar

Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
A massless bar of length \(1\) m is pivoted at one end and subjected to a force \(F\) at the other end. Two translational dampers, with damping constants \(c_1 = 10 \ N\cdot s/m\) and \(c_2 = 15 \ N\cdot s/m\) are connected to the bar as shown in figure 1.109. Determine the equivalent damping constant, \(c_{eq}\), of the system so that the force \(F\) at point \(A\) can be expressed as \(F = c_{eq}v\), where \(v\) is the linear velocity of point \(A\).

to08USD.jpg




What I have is \(F_{d1} = c_1\dot{x} = -r_1c_1\sin(\theta)\dot{\theta}\) and \(F_{d2} = c_2\dot{x} = -r_2c_1\sin(\theta)\dot{\theta}\) where \(r_2 = r_1\frac{x_2}{x_1}\).

\(F_d = c_{eq}\dot{x} = -rc_{eq}\sin(\theta)\dot{\theta}\) so \(c_{eq} = c_1 + \frac{x_2}{x_1}c_2\).

Is this correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Nope, I don't think so. You aren't really clear on your definitions of locations and such, but I think I can follow it. Anyway, your solution doesn't take into account how long the bar is. There are three important values of x.
## x_1+0.25m ##, ## x_2+0.75m ##, and ## x_3+1m ##, they all affect the solution.

Try again and think about the torque applied at each of those three position versus the velocity. The linear velocity in the damper is related to the angular velocity of the rotating bar. Each of those three points will have the same angular velocity. Use the small angle approximation for the sin term. This is equivalent to assuming the dampers are well aligned with the bar (perpendicular to it).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top