Especially unreasonable requirements to get your degree

  • Thread starter Thread starter DiracPool
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Degree
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the unreasonable academic requirements faced by students in higher education, particularly in STEM fields. Participants recount experiences such as memorizing intricate details, like shell patterns of aquatic invertebrates and resistor color codes, which they deemed excessive and impractical for future applications. The conversation also touches on historical practices in mathematics, where students performed numerical analysis without computers, highlighting the evolution of educational methods. Overall, the consensus reflects a shared sentiment that certain educational demands may not align with real-world applicability.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic biological taxonomy, specifically aquatic invertebrates.
  • Familiarity with numerical analysis techniques, including Runge-Kutta methods.
  • Knowledge of resistor color coding and its significance in electronics.
  • Awareness of historical computing methods and their evolution over time.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the pedagogical approaches in STEM education and their effectiveness.
  • Explore modern techniques for teaching complex biological concepts, such as interactive learning tools.
  • Investigate the historical context of numerical analysis and its transition to computer-aided methods.
  • Learn about the significance of conceptual understanding in education versus rote memorization.
USEFUL FOR

Students in STEM fields, educators seeking to improve teaching methodologies, and anyone interested in the historical context of academic requirements in higher education.

DiracPool
Messages
1,247
Reaction score
514
I was just watching a "Big think" interview with Michio Kaku. There was a segment where he showed uncharacteristic indignation over the fact that he had to memorize all the hundreds of particles in the particle zoo in order to get his PhD in Physics: Fast forward to 31:00

http://bigthink.com/videos/big-think-interview-with-michio-kaku

That reminded me of a similar experience I had as an undergrad going for my Biology degree. As an elective, I chose to take this class entitled, "Natural history of aquatic invertebrates." One of the requirements to pass this class is that we had to memorize the shell patterns of several hundred species of aquatic invertebrates. Sometimes these patterns differed so subtlety from one species to another that the only difference between two shells was a close to imperceptible variation in the way the lines curved on one segment of the shell.

If that wasn't enough, we had to match each one of these patterns to the scientific name of each species. You can imagine how fun that was to memorize as well. I think we were allowed mild misspellings, but if you got the genus wrong, watch out!

With this type of operation, you had to study in groups or at least with a partner and use flash cards. I remember us railing (as students often do) about when would we ever need this skill to memorize these shell patterns in future life. But as opposed to my algebra class as a kid, I think I was justified here with the shell patterns..

Anyway, through some small miracle I passed the class. But my question to you, the reader, is did you have a similar experience in college when something you were asked to do went waaaaay above and beyond any reasonably justifiable sense that it was going to help anybody or anything later in life?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DiracPool said:
...did you have a similar experience in college when something you were asked to do went waaaaay above and beyond any reasonably justifiable sense that it was going to help anybody or anything later in life?
No
 
DiracPool said:
But my question to you, the reader, is did you have a similar experience in college when something you were asked to do went waaaaay above and beyond any reasonably justifiable sense that it was going to help anybody or anything later in life?
During my studies I was asked, on more than one occasion, to work together with other people.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TubbaBlubba and NovicePWizzard
A friend of mine was a grad student in math. He had to do numerical analysis without a computer. That was in 1972 or something, but still...
 
Hornbein said:
He had to do numerical analysis without a computer.
Runge-Kutta methods, for example, were invented over a hundred years ago. But yes, I'm happy I was not the one applying them back then.
 
Hornbein said:
A friend of mine was a grad student in math. He had to do numerical analysis without a computer. That was in 1972 or something, but still...
I would think that a grad student in math would be studying the algorithms and methods. A computer would not be essential.
 
Hornbein said:
A friend of mine was a grad student in math. He had to do numerical analysis without a computer. That was in 1972 or something, but still...
Yup. Back in pre-computer days, offices full of "computers" (i.e. human beings who punched adding-machine-type calculators) did the work. I have some older books (1930s-1940s) which show one how to organize the calculations for celestial mechanics with that method.
 
FactChecker said:
I would think that a grad student in math would be studying the algorithms and methods. A computer would not be essential.

He was doing the computations. By hand.
 
tfr000 said:
Yup. Back in pre-computer days, offices full of "computers" (i.e. human beings who punched adding-machine-type calculators) did the work. I have some older books (1930s-1940s) which show one how to organize the calculations for celestial mechanics with that method.

Yep, back then they used to measure computer power in "Kilo-girls" They'd fill large rooms with rows of girls used as human tabulating machines during the war.

http://www.theatlantic.com/technolo...wer-used-to-be-measured-in-kilo-girls/280633/

computer_wide.jpe
 
  • #10
  • #11
In one of my classes, we had to memorize what values the colors on a resistor represented.

Why should I do that when I had a pencil?

rca_pencil_19.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: S.G. Janssens
  • #12
In the most general sense, introductory classes where you're asked to remember great levels of detail about the material taught. This is extremely difficult to do in intro courses, where one just gets a general grasp.
 
  • #13
Luckily it hasn't really happened. I am supposed to remember some names of people that did some important work to understand the learning process in a few months.
Probably won't happen.

I adored exams where you could derive your way out of trouble.
It saved my ass a couple times. These days I'm more concerned about conceptual understanding.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 79 ·
3
Replies
79
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
11K