- #1
- 1
- 0
Hi
I'm new to this forum and I might have putted this thread in wrong section.
My question i would like to get answered its a bit complicated, I know...
I have had very weird accident while riding a motorcycle as a courier in London. I don't know what caused the accident because I lost memory and had severe head injury.
After all things gathered together, it looks like that it was either riders error or mechanical fault.
There is a thing of proving that it wasnt a rider error if i can prove how fast I was going...
There is a bracket which was used by ambulance to establish what injuries I can have... its 30-40mph
Now, i don't have the bike anymore, it was cannibalised for parts and destroyed after the accident. I have a forensic collision report which confirms that it was a low speed crash.
I have some photographic evidence - bike after the crash... I can show also where exactly this did happen...on google Earth :)
Is here someone who specialize in this field of establishing as accurate as possible how fast i was going.
You see, if i can prove for example that i was doing 30-34 mph or less, the riders error theory will be out of window and will confirm that it was a mechanical fault...
Can anyone help me with this?
Thank you
I'm new to this forum and I might have putted this thread in wrong section.
My question i would like to get answered its a bit complicated, I know...
I have had very weird accident while riding a motorcycle as a courier in London. I don't know what caused the accident because I lost memory and had severe head injury.
After all things gathered together, it looks like that it was either riders error or mechanical fault.
There is a thing of proving that it wasnt a rider error if i can prove how fast I was going...
There is a bracket which was used by ambulance to establish what injuries I can have... its 30-40mph
Now, i don't have the bike anymore, it was cannibalised for parts and destroyed after the accident. I have a forensic collision report which confirms that it was a low speed crash.
I have some photographic evidence - bike after the crash... I can show also where exactly this did happen...on google Earth :)
Is here someone who specialize in this field of establishing as accurate as possible how fast i was going.
You see, if i can prove for example that i was doing 30-34 mph or less, the riders error theory will be out of window and will confirm that it was a mechanical fault...
Can anyone help me with this?
Thank you