Estimated varaince of sample data

  • Thread starter Thread starter somecelxis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Data
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
10 replies · 1K views
somecelxis
Messages
121
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


sample data as bellow:
46,48,51,50,45,53,50,48

to find the estimated varaince , the ans with 6.10 is correct... why can't i use this way? my ans for second way is 19051. which is wrong...

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Var(x) = E(x^2) -( E(x)^2) = 19159- ( ((391/8) ^2 ) = 16670, then my s^2 = 16670...
i use the top part of the formula ,( 8/ (8-1) ) x 16670 = 19051
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20141003_205223[1].jpg
    IMG_20141003_205223[1].jpg
    9.9 KB · Views: 498
  • IMG_20141003_211023[1].jpg
    IMG_20141003_211023[1].jpg
    25.6 KB · Views: 501
Physics news on Phys.org
In the left shred that you should have retyped under 2. Relevant equations (in which case you would have seen your error) the recipe differs from what you type under

The Attempt at a Solution



(Basically, your <x2> is wrong. )
 
my E(X^2) = 19159... why it's wrong? then what should it be?
 
You can compute the variance of the sample - you don't have to estimate it.
Usually your are expected to estimate the variance of the population from the sample.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variance#Population_variance_and_sample_variance

However, I cannot tell how you went wrong unless you show your reasoning and calculation.
But it looks like you, at least, have another step to go.
 
Hey guys, let's not all of us be so tough on this guy! He did present something under 3. and I try to point out to him that ##E \ne \Sigma## ...then he's done
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: somecelxis
As BvU points out, you forgot part of the calculation of E[X2]. The other issue is you have to decide whether you are trying to find the actual variance of the sample or estimate the variance of the underlying population. Only the second involves the n/(n-1) factor.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: somecelxis
Just for the heck of it, you have a very, very special sample here! Doesn't happen very often that ##<x> = \Sigma (x - <x>)^2 ## exactly !

By the way, is excelsis still here ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: somecelxis
BvU said:
mething under
thanks all, i managed to solve the question above.