I Estimating Mass of Central Object Using S2's Orbit Motion and Kepler's 3rd Law

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter doopa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on estimating the mass of a central object using the orbit motion of star S2 and Kepler's 3rd Law. Participants clarify that the "radius" in the calculations refers to half the semi-major axis of the elliptical orbit, which is approximately 0.1 arcseconds. There is a suggestion to consider the tilt of the orbit when estimating the mass, as it may affect the calculations. The importance of accurately interpreting the graph and understanding the angular size of the orbit is emphasized. Overall, the conversation seeks clarity on applying these concepts to derive the mass effectively.
doopa
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
I want to understand how one can go about estimating the mass of a central object given the a graph the orbital motion of S2, or any given star for that matter.
During one of my class lectures, we were shown a graph of star S2's orbit motion (shown at the bottom of this post) and was told to try and figure out how to find the mass of the central object using Kepler’s 3rd law in solar units, as shown below:
1678026251763.png


We were also given a hint to use the arcsec relation and read the radius of the orbit from the image, as shown below:
1678026338495.png


From my notes, it looks like we had to use the declination value of 0.1, but I still don't understand how exactly we got to that point. Does anyone happen to know why this is and how to generally use these types of graphs to estimate the mass of a central object?

1678026170065.png
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The "radius" in the formula is actually half the semi-major axis of the ellipse (which obviously doesn't have a constant radius). Based on the diagram, 0.1'' might be a good estimate for the semi-major axis.
 
As @pasmith said, reading from the diagram, the semimajor axis is about 0.1". This is the θ in your second formula. It is not a declination, it is the angular size of the orbit.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top