I Estimating Mass of Central Object Using S2's Orbit Motion and Kepler's 3rd Law

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter doopa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on estimating the mass of a central object using the orbit motion of star S2 and Kepler's 3rd Law. Participants clarify that the "radius" in the calculations refers to half the semi-major axis of the elliptical orbit, which is approximately 0.1 arcseconds. There is a suggestion to consider the tilt of the orbit when estimating the mass, as it may affect the calculations. The importance of accurately interpreting the graph and understanding the angular size of the orbit is emphasized. Overall, the conversation seeks clarity on applying these concepts to derive the mass effectively.
doopa
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
I want to understand how one can go about estimating the mass of a central object given the a graph the orbital motion of S2, or any given star for that matter.
During one of my class lectures, we were shown a graph of star S2's orbit motion (shown at the bottom of this post) and was told to try and figure out how to find the mass of the central object using Kepler’s 3rd law in solar units, as shown below:
1678026251763.png


We were also given a hint to use the arcsec relation and read the radius of the orbit from the image, as shown below:
1678026338495.png


From my notes, it looks like we had to use the declination value of 0.1, but I still don't understand how exactly we got to that point. Does anyone happen to know why this is and how to generally use these types of graphs to estimate the mass of a central object?

1678026170065.png
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The "radius" in the formula is actually half the semi-major axis of the ellipse (which obviously doesn't have a constant radius). Based on the diagram, 0.1'' might be a good estimate for the semi-major axis.
 
As @pasmith said, reading from the diagram, the semimajor axis is about 0.1". This is the θ in your second formula. It is not a declination, it is the angular size of the orbit.
 
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top