Is Ether Essential for Electromagnetic Wave Propagation?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter saiarun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ether
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of Ether as a medium for electromagnetic wave propagation, originally proposed by Maxwell. It addresses the unique properties of Ether that differentiate it from other substances, emphasizing its role in explaining the propagation of electromagnetic waves even in a vacuum. The conversation also highlights how Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity and the Michelson-Morley experiment suggest that if Ether exists, it must be stationary relative to Earth, thus not detectable through motion. Ultimately, Ether is redefined as a particle medium that could explain wave motion in a vacuum.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell's equations and their implications for electromagnetic waves
  • Familiarity with Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity
  • Knowledge of the Michelson-Morley experiment and its significance in physics
  • Basic concepts of wave motion and particle theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Maxwell's equations and their role in electromagnetic theory
  • Study the implications of the Michelson-Morley experiment on the concept of Ether
  • Explore the historical context and development of the Special Theory of Relativity
  • Investigate modern interpretations of vacuum and particle mediums in quantum physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of electromagnetic theory, and anyone interested in the historical and theoretical aspects of wave propagation and the concept of Ether.

saiarun
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
It is known that the concept of Ether was present in the whole of the Universe was started by Maxwell for representing the material medium for the travel of the electromagnetic waves.
Question 1: Why Ether and not any other substance i.e., what are the special properties of the Ether?
Question 2: How Einstein`s basic assumption in the Special theory of Relativity proved that if Ether exist it should in Absolute frame of Reference (theoretically) and was disproved by Michelson and Morley(experimentally)?
Thanking you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Wave motion is the composite motion of particles, thus for em waves to exist,
a particle medium is required to carry them. The Ether was proposed as such a medium. Why the Ether if so many atoms are available to carry em wave motion? Probably to explain the odd fact that when they created a "vacuum" in a lab, em waves still propagated. So their "Ether" can be thought of as a particle medium whose particles are so small that lab techniques could mistake it as a vacuum.

2. The ether, if it existed, should behave like a pool of water inside a 747. The pool of water would seem motionless and when a nickel dropped in it, the ripples emanating spherically outward, just like a nickel dropped in a pool in someone's backyard. In other words, the Ether in which the MM experiment was carried out is stationary with the Earth so that you couldn't detect any "Ether" winds. Einstein's Special Relativity and the MM experiment then did not disprove the existence of an Ether but only that if there was, the Earth and other masses carry their own Ether so that you can't tell your motion through it because it is stationary relative to you. Stationary however is very different from being superfluous, which was what many believers in SR called it. The Mayflower stationary in a still Atlantic Ocean for example does not make the Atlantic Ocean superfluous. Nor does a Honda Civic stopped at a traffic light make the "stationary" pavement beneath it superfluous.

A more correct way to describe the Ether then is that it is any particle medium and an alternative way of interpreting em waves' propagation through a vacuum, to make it consistent with the notion of wave motion being a composite of particle motion, is that the vacuum generated in labs is not a true vacuum but are composed of tiny "ether particles".
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
6K