Euclidean Geometry - Demonstration Exercise

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving geometric properties related to Euclidean geometry, specifically involving lines and points in the plane \(R^2\). It establishes that if points are on opposite sides of a line \(m\), they belong to distinct semiplanes. The conversation also addresses the union of segments and the conditions under which specific geometric relationships hold true. Key definitions and precise terminology are emphasized to ensure clarity in geometric proofs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Euclidean geometry concepts, particularly lines and semiplanes.
  • Familiarity with geometric proofs and logical reasoning.
  • Knowledge of the notation used in geometry, such as segments and unions.
  • Basic understanding of the Cartesian plane \(R^2\).
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of lines and planes in Euclidean geometry.
  • Learn about the concept of semiplanes and their applications in geometric proofs.
  • Explore the union of segments and how to justify geometric relationships.
  • Investigate the definitions and implications of "opposite sides" in geometric contexts.
USEFUL FOR

Students of geometry, mathematics educators, and anyone interested in understanding the foundational principles of Euclidean geometry and geometric proofs.

Samuel Gomes
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
(a) Let be m a line and
[IMG]
the only two semiplans determined by m.

(i) Show that: If
[IMG]
are points that do not belong to
[IMG]
such
[IMG]
, so
[IMG]
and
[IMG]
are in opposite sides of m.

(ii) In the same conditions of the last item, show:
[IMG]
and
[IMG]
.

(iii) Determine the union result
[IMG]
, carefully justifying your answer.

(b) Let be
[IMG]
and
[IMG]
4 distincts points in a line
[IMG]
such
[IMG]
and
[IMG]
. Show
[IMG]
and
[IMG]
.

(c) Let be
[IMG]
distincts points in a line m such
[IMG]
. Under these conditions, show 2 distinct segments such the Union of both segments be equal to
[IMG]
, carefully justifying your answer.

Thanks for the help ^^
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Proofs in Geometry and mathematics in general are heavily dependent on precise definitions! First, I assume this is in $R^2$ since it is not true in higher dimensions. But how are you defining "opposite sides" of a line? Is "PmA" the plane determined by the line m and the point A? If so HOW is a plane determined by a line and a point not on that line? For points A, B, and C, does "A-B-C" mean that B lies between A and C? If so, look at the segments AB and BC. What is their union?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K