Euclidean Reflection Groups _ Kane's text

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the properties of reflections in Euclidean space as described in Kane's "Reflection Groups and Invariant Theory." Specifically, it addresses the definitions and proofs of two properties of reflections: (1) the formula for the reflection operator \( s_{\alpha} \) and (2) the orthogonality of the reflection operator. The reflection \( s_{\alpha} \) is defined in \( \ell \)-dimensional Euclidean space \( E = \mathbb{R}^{\ell} \) and is characterized by its action on hyperplanes and vectors. The discussion emphasizes the geometric interpretation of reflections and the linearity of the operator.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Euclidean space \( \mathbb{R}^{\ell} \)
  • Familiarity with inner product spaces
  • Knowledge of linear operators and their properties
  • Basic concepts of reflection geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the geometric interpretation of reflections in \( \mathbb{R}^{2} \)
  • Learn about linear transformations and their representations
  • Explore the concept of orthogonal transformations in linear algebra
  • Investigate the properties of hyperplanes in Euclidean spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and anyone interested in the geometric properties of reflection groups and invariant theory.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Kane - Reflection Groups and Invariant Theory and need help with two of the properties of reflections stated on page 7

(see attachment - Kane _ Reflection Groups and Invariant Theory - pages 6-7)

On page 6 Kane mentions he is working in \ell dimensional Euclidean space ie E = R^{\ell} where R^{\ell} has the usual inner product (x,y).

In defining reflections with respect to vectors Kane writes:

" Given 0 \ne \alpha \in E let H_{\alpha}\subset E be the hyperplane

H_{\alpha} = \{ x | (x, \alpha ) = 0 \}

We then define the reflection s_{\alpha} : E \longrightarrow E by the rules

s_{\alpha} \cdot x = x if x \in H_{\alpha}

s_{\alpha} \cdot \alpha = - \alpha "

Then Kane states that the following two properties follow:

(1) s_{\alpha} \cdot x = x - [2 ( x, \alpha) / (\alpha, \alpha)] \alpha for all x \in E

(2) s_{\alpha} is orthogonal, ie ( s_{\alpha} \cdot x , s_{\alpha} \cdot y ) = (x,y) for all x, y \in E


I would appreciate help to show (1) and (2) above.

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that ##H_\alpha## is codim 1 in E with perp spanned by ##\alpha##. So any linear operator defined on E is completely determined by its action on ##H_\alpha## and ##\alpha##. In particular, there is a unique linear operator satisfying the defining conditions for ##s_\alpha##. Since the mapping defined by the RHS of (1) is linear and satisfies these conditions as well, it must be ##x \mapsto s_\alpha x##.

Of course what's going on geometrically is that ##s_\alpha## is simply reflection in the hyperplane ##H_\alpha##. Try this out in ##R^2##, with ##H_\alpha## a line through the origin that is perpendicular to ##\alpha##: what is the formula for reflecting about ##H_\alpha##?

As for (2), it suffices to check that it holds in the 3 cases: (a) ##x,y \in H_\alpha##; (b) ##x\in H_\alpha## and ##y=\alpha##; and (c) ##x=y=\alpha##. Or you could use (1).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
959
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
934
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K